2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00020943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dividend timing and behavior in laboratory asset markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noussair et al (2001), Bostian et al (2005) and Holt et al (2017) all report bubbles using designs with a flat fundamental value pattern. While St€ ockl et al (2015) find fewer bubbles and improved pricing when fundamentals are flat, Smith et al (2000) report bubbles in such markets only when there was a large cash injection before the first period. Huber et al (2019) explore how several design features (for example, how past periods' prices are displayed) affect bubble frequency and severity in SSW flat experimental markets.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Noussair et al (2001), Bostian et al (2005) and Holt et al (2017) all report bubbles using designs with a flat fundamental value pattern. While St€ ockl et al (2015) find fewer bubbles and improved pricing when fundamentals are flat, Smith et al (2000) report bubbles in such markets only when there was a large cash injection before the first period. Huber et al (2019) explore how several design features (for example, how past periods' prices are displayed) affect bubble frequency and severity in SSW flat experimental markets.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We employ the Smith et al (1988) and Smith et al (2000) paradigm, where participants use experimental currency units (ECU) to trade an asset with a common dividend process. Trading is done over 15 trading periods.…”
Section: Experimental Asset Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper, using a controlled laboratory setting, aims to test whether the PoW mechanism and its implied properties, discussed above, fuel bubbles in cryptocurrency markets. Our experimental setup follows Smith et al (2000) where market participants can trade an asset with a random redemption value. There are several advantages of using this design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that its liquidity is overvalued or mispriced in relation to the values of its assets. Smith et al, [31] held that more bubbles are associated with stocks that pay dividends than with those that do not. In line, Caginalpet al, [32] debate that the frequent payment of dividend makes investors to trade more myopically in the short term than in the long term, thus, the higher the dividends and liquidity positions of the firm, the more bubbles is experienced [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%