2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.463083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dividend Taxes and Implied Cost of Equity Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the residual earnings model and abnormal earnings growth model to estimate the expected rate of return on equity investment (Baginski and Wahlen, 2003;Claus and Thomas, 2001;Easton, 2004;Easton and Monahan, 2005;Easton and Sommers, 2007;Easton et al, 2002;Gebhardt et al, 2001;Gode and Mohanram, 2003;O'Hanlon and Steele, 2000;Ohlson and Juettner-Nauroth, 2005). A number of studies have used the implied cost of capital that is inferred from the reverse-engineered models to test the link between the required rates of return and relevant factors that may affect them (Cheng et al, 2006;Daske, 2006;Dhaliwal et al, 2005;Easton and Sommers, 2007).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Implied Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the residual earnings model and abnormal earnings growth model to estimate the expected rate of return on equity investment (Baginski and Wahlen, 2003;Claus and Thomas, 2001;Easton, 2004;Easton and Monahan, 2005;Easton and Sommers, 2007;Easton et al, 2002;Gebhardt et al, 2001;Gode and Mohanram, 2003;O'Hanlon and Steele, 2000;Ohlson and Juettner-Nauroth, 2005). A number of studies have used the implied cost of capital that is inferred from the reverse-engineered models to test the link between the required rates of return and relevant factors that may affect them (Cheng et al, 2006;Daske, 2006;Dhaliwal et al, 2005;Easton and Sommers, 2007).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Implied Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult to control for other factors that may affect the cost of capital, because these factors are typically firm-specific (Easton 2006;Dhaliwal et al 2005). One way to deal with this issue is to use a constant sample, that is, the firm is used as its own control when the cost of capital is compared before and after an event (for example, Daske 2006;Easton 2006).…”
Section: Using Current Realized Earnings As Expected Earningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the sample period is long, risk factors could change over time for the same firm; thus using a constant sample is likely inadequate to control for changes in other risk factors. A second limitation of the Easton and Sommers (2007) models is that the number of observations (that is, cost of capital estimates) is greatly reduced and consequently the power of any statistical test will also be reduced (Dhaliwal et al 2005).…”
Section: Using Current Realized Earnings As Expected Earningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations