The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Transparency, Governance and Markets 2006
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044452722-6/50008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dividend Policy of Bank Initial Public Offerings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Banks appear to be intrinsically more opaque than non-bank institutions (Morgan 2002;Iannotta 2006;Blau et al 2017). They can signal their value to outsiders through their dividend policies (Boldin and Leggett 1995;Bessler et al 2006;Cornett et al 2011), and both positive and negative dividend changes affect the value of their stocks more strongly than that of non-bank institutions (Keen 1983;Filbeck and Mullineaux 1993;Bessler and Nohel 1996). In contrast, share repurchases appear less important as a market signal (Hirtle 2014), possibly because they do not constitute a permanent commitment and, unlike dividends, are paid out of temporary rather than sustainable cash flows (Jagannathan et al 2000) or are less costly to investors than are dividends (Grullon and Michaely 2002).…”
Section: Investor Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banks appear to be intrinsically more opaque than non-bank institutions (Morgan 2002;Iannotta 2006;Blau et al 2017). They can signal their value to outsiders through their dividend policies (Boldin and Leggett 1995;Bessler et al 2006;Cornett et al 2011), and both positive and negative dividend changes affect the value of their stocks more strongly than that of non-bank institutions (Keen 1983;Filbeck and Mullineaux 1993;Bessler and Nohel 1996). In contrast, share repurchases appear less important as a market signal (Hirtle 2014), possibly because they do not constitute a permanent commitment and, unlike dividends, are paid out of temporary rather than sustainable cash flows (Jagannathan et al 2000) or are less costly to investors than are dividends (Grullon and Michaely 2002).…”
Section: Investor Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%