2007
DOI: 10.1108/03074350710715782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dividend behaviour of Indian companies under monetary policy restrictions

Abstract: In this study we examine the dividend behaviour of Indian companies. We use GMM estimator, which is the most suitable methodology in a dynamic setting. Our results show that the Indian firms have lower target ratios and higher adjustment factors. The most significant result is that the restricted monetary policies have significant influence on the dividend behaviour of Indian firms, causing about 5-6 percent reduction in the payout ratios. The significance of macro economic policy variable suggest that monetar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While these findings imply that firms do follow stable policy, it is important to note that the speed of adjustment is equal to 0.414 (Lintner model) and 0.370 (Fama and Babiak model). These values are higher than the 0.30 reported by Lintner (1956) for US firms and the 0.33 reported by Brav et al (2005) for US firms (1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), and lower than the 0.71 reported by Pandey and Bhat (2007) for Indian firms, and the 1.00 reported by Adaoglu (2000) for Turkish firms. The fact that high rapidity of adjustments indicates lesser smoothing and a lesser amount of stability, we can conclude that our sample of firms do follow stable dividend policy.…”
Section: Dps It = α 1 + β 1 Eps It + β 2 Dps It-1 + ε Itmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…While these findings imply that firms do follow stable policy, it is important to note that the speed of adjustment is equal to 0.414 (Lintner model) and 0.370 (Fama and Babiak model). These values are higher than the 0.30 reported by Lintner (1956) for US firms and the 0.33 reported by Brav et al (2005) for US firms (1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), and lower than the 0.71 reported by Pandey and Bhat (2007) for Indian firms, and the 1.00 reported by Adaoglu (2000) for Turkish firms. The fact that high rapidity of adjustments indicates lesser smoothing and a lesser amount of stability, we can conclude that our sample of firms do follow stable dividend policy.…”
Section: Dps It = α 1 + β 1 Eps It + β 2 Dps It-1 + ε Itmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Many other major macroeconomic factors specifically monetary policy can be used along with these variables. Although, Pandey and Bhat, (2007) in India and Mohsin International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 9, No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mishra and Narender (1996) also report similar findings for state-owned-enterprises in India. Pandey and Bhat (2007) have found that restricted monetary policy leads to a reduction in dividend payments. They also report that the previous two years' dividends and the current year's dividend are significant for a dividend payout in India.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Dividend Policymentioning
confidence: 99%