2004
DOI: 10.1353/wp.2004.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse

Abstract: Federal states in which component regions are invested with distinct ethnic content are more likely to collapse when they contain a core ethnic region, a single ethnic region enjoying pronounced superiority in population. Dividing a dominant group into multiple federal regions reduces these dangers. A study of world casesfindsthat all ethnofederal states that have collapsed have possessed core ethnic regions. Thus, ethnofederalism, so long as it is instituted without a core ethnic region, may represent a viabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The breakdown of the USSR offers a good example of this argument. Variants of this institutional view include Bunce (1999); Hale (2004);Beissinger (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The breakdown of the USSR offers a good example of this argument. Variants of this institutional view include Bunce (1999); Hale (2004);Beissinger (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hale (2004), in such divided societies with geographically concentrated communal groups, a federal system is undoubtedly an excellent way to provide a sense of autonomy for these groups.…”
Section: Spatial Organization Of Power and Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomierechte werden im überwiegenden Teil der empirischen Studien lediglich als Teilaspekt von politischen Dezentralisierungsinstitutionen berücksichtigt, die z. B. auch föderale Strukturen umfassen (Brancati 2006, Hale 2004. Werden Autonomierechte im Speziellen untersucht, kommen Studien, die auf dem MAR-Datensatz basieren, zu dem Schluss, dass historische politische Autonomie die Sezessionswahrscheinlichkeit einer kulturellen Gruppe signifikant erhöht (Gurr 1993 (Schubert 2012, 192) führe zu einer kulturellen Hegemonie der Mehrheit in den meisten Nationalstaaten (Taylor 1993, 57).…”
Section: Die Anerkennung Kultureller Besonderheit In Der Empirischen unclassified