Divided versus selective attention: Evidence for common processing mechanisms

Abstract

The current study revisited the question of whether there are brain mechanisms specific to divided attention that differ from those used in selective attention. Increased neuronal activity required to simultaneously process two stimulus dimensions as compared with each separate dimension has often been observed, but rarely has activity induced by a divided attention condition exceeded the sum of activity induced by the component tasks. Healthy participants performed a selective-divided attention paradigm while undergoing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). The task required participants to make a same-different judgment about either one of two simultaneously presented stimulus dimensions, or about both dimensions. Performance accuracy was equated between tasks by dynamically adjusting the stimulus display time. Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal differences between tasks were identified by whole-brain voxel-wise comparisons and by region-specific analyses of all areas modulated by the divided attention task (DIV). No region displayed greater activation or deactivation by DIV than the sum of signal change by the two selective attention tasks. Instead, regional activity followed the tasks' processing demands as reflected by reaction time. Only a left cerebellar region displayed a correlation between participants' BOLD signal intensity and reaction time that was selective for DIV. The correlation was positive, reflecting slower responding with greater activation. Overall, the findings do not support the existence of functional brain activity specific to DIV. Increased activity appears to reflect additional processing demands by introducing a secondary task, but those demands do not appear to qualitatively differ from processes of selective attention. SectionCognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience

Relationships Between Impulsivity, Anxiety, and Risk-Taking and the Neural Correlates of Attention in Adolescents

“…Brain regions previously implicated in selective and divided attention (Hahn et al, 2008; Johnson & Zatorre, 2006; Vohn et al, 2007) were also significantly more active in those with higher risk-taking scores. During auditory selective attention, high risk-taking was associated with increased activation in frontoparietal regions (DLPFC, IPL) involved in top-down attentional control, and with bilateral IPL activation during divided attention.…”

“…When visual selective and divided attention tasks were matched for difficulty, divided attention was associated only with increased activation in visual processing regions (Nebel et al, 2005), similar to earlier studies in which increases in attentional demands increased activation in the respective sensory cortices. Also arguing against distinct neural substrates for selective and divided attention, divided attention between color and angle did not activate regions beyond the sum of selective attention to one or the other (Hahn et al, 2008). However, these studies did not examine cross-modal attention and thus may not be directly comparable to studies including a cross-modal component.…”

A Review of the Neuropsychological Dimensions of Tourette Syndrome

“…Divided attention is often understood as the ability to optimize resource allocation in relation to environmental requirements [ 59 ]. Tasks used to measure this ability usually involve stimuli from two different dimensions or modalities [ 60 ].…”

The Effect of Hands-Free Cell Phone Conversation on Psychomotor Performance Required for Safe Driving: A Quasi-Experimental Study

“…We also detected an association between HFCC and divided attention performance. In a divided attention task, the individual is requested to display 2 or more concurrent procedures and to appropriately reply to particular stimuli (30). During a cell phone conversation, a driver is distracted cognitively and must divide his/her attention between the conversation and tasks of driving (31).…”