2018
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1402775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divide and Recombine Approaches for Fitting Smoothing Spline Models with Large Datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting 25 bp CDTS scores have 13.46% missing rate. In our analyses, we apply a Sequential Divide and Recombine approach 20 and impute the missing data by cubic smoothing spline estimates whenever possible, as follows. (1) Divide the range of positions into disjoint intervals so that the CDTS values are either available or missing in each interval.…”
Section: Cdts Imputation By Cubic Smoothing Splinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting 25 bp CDTS scores have 13.46% missing rate. In our analyses, we apply a Sequential Divide and Recombine approach 20 and impute the missing data by cubic smoothing spline estimates whenever possible, as follows. (1) Divide the range of positions into disjoint intervals so that the CDTS values are either available or missing in each interval.…”
Section: Cdts Imputation By Cubic Smoothing Splinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shang and Cheng (2017) studied the divide-and-conquer method for periodic smoothing splines and argued from a theoretical perspective that sample splitting may be viewed as an alternative form of regularization, playing a role similar to a smoothing parameter. Xu and Wang (2018) proposed two pairs of D&C approaches to fitting a cubic smoothing splines model on a large data set. One pair of approaches divide data in a simple random way, and the other in a sequential way by partitioning the domain into subintervals.…”
Section: A3 Proof Of Theorem 222mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One pair of approaches divide data in a simple random way, and the other in a sequential way by partitioning the domain into subintervals. We note that both Shang and Cheng (2017) and Xu and Wang (2018) only considered smoothing splines on a univariate domain. And the extension of D&C to modeling of our temperature monitoring experiment may have some other issues.…”
Section: A3 Proof Of Theorem 222mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ma et al (2015) developed an adaptive sampling scheme to select subsets of representers according to the magnitude of the response variable. When the roughness and magnitude of the underlying function do not coincide, the method in Ma et al (2015) is not spatially adaptive (Xu & Wang, 2018). Wood (2003) used the Lanczos algorithm (Lanczos, 1950) to obtain the truncated eigendecomposition for thin‐plate splines in O ( Kn 2 ) operations with K being the rank of the low‐rank approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%