Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2017 2017
DOI: 10.5244/c.31.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divide and Fuse: A Re-ranking Approach for Person Re-identification

Abstract: As re-ranking is a necessary procedure to boost person re-identification (re-ID) performance on large-scale datasets, the diversity of feature becomes crucial to person re-ID for its importance both on designing pedestrian descriptions and re-ranking based on feature fusion. However, in many circumstances, only one type of pedestrian feature is available. In this paper, we propose a "Divide and Fuse" re-ranking framework for person re-ID. It exploits the diversity from different parts of a high-dimensional fea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally we report the performance of our approach with other stateof-the-art results in Tables 4 and 5. Note that we do not apply any post processing such as re-ranking [51] or multi-query fusion [53]. On each dataset, our approach attains the best performance.…”
Section: Discriminative Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally we report the performance of our approach with other stateof-the-art results in Tables 4 and 5. Note that we do not apply any post processing such as re-ranking [51] or multi-query fusion [53]. On each dataset, our approach attains the best performance.…”
Section: Discriminative Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this line, Sarfraz et al [30] aggregated distances between expanded neighbors of image pairs to reinforce the original pairwise distance. Moreover, to take advantage of the diversity within a single feature, Yu et al [56] further fused distances between different sub-features. Spectral clustering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6, we compare with the current best models. A total of 11 representative state-of-the-art methods, BOW+XQDA [53], PUL [7], LOMO+XQDA [25], IDE [54], IDE+DaF [51], IDE+XQ.+Re-ranking [55], PAN, DPFL [4], and the newly proposed methods SVDNet [39], TriNet + Era. [56], and TriNet + Era.…”
Section: Cuhk03 Person Re-identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%