Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3485447.3512163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divide-and-Conquer: Post-User Interaction Network for Fake News Detection on Social Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other works focused on modelling users and their interactions on a more in-depth level to support fake news detection. A popular approach is to construct heterogeneous graphs of article and user nodes where articles share edges with users who interacted with them, and where users are linked to users with whom they share explicit social relations like followership ( Chandra, et al, 2020 , Min, et al, 2022 , Nguyen et al, 2020 ). It could be argued that meaningful social groups can be formed from the users’ social networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works focused on modelling users and their interactions on a more in-depth level to support fake news detection. A popular approach is to construct heterogeneous graphs of article and user nodes where articles share edges with users who interacted with them, and where users are linked to users with whom they share explicit social relations like followership ( Chandra, et al, 2020 , Min, et al, 2022 , Nguyen et al, 2020 ). It could be argued that meaningful social groups can be formed from the users’ social networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propagation-based methods can utilize rich auxiliary social media information, including news spreaders' intent [2] or profiles [10], relationships between news spreaders and their posts [11], social feedback [12]- [14], social networks [15], and propagation paths [16], [17]. Nevertheless, they can only be deployed after news articles published on news outlets have been disseminated on social media.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karimi et al 187 proposed a fake news detection approach (MMFD) using an automated feature extraction method that can accept the news that comes from multiple sources and detect whether news is fake or real and classify them depending on their degrees of fakeness. Hosseinimotlagh and Papalexakis 188 used the tensor factorization, Wang et al 189 195 used some evaluation models such as count vectorizer, N-gram, and TF-IDF vectorizer with the ML algorithms, Kanagavalli et al 196 used classification based on bi-directional long short term memory (BiLSTM), Jarrahi and Safari 197 introduced convolutional neural network in sentence-level, many other authors [198][199][200][201] also used various ML based approach for detecting fake news on OSNs.…”
Section: Solutions For Fake News Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using deep convolutional layers, Tembhurne et al 193 developed a multi‐channel model (Mc‐DNN) that extracts the most important features without considering hand‐crafted features. Choudhury and Acharjee 194 used SVM, random forest, naive Bayes, and logistic regression classifiers, Raja and Raj 195 used some evaluation models such as count vectorizer, N‐gram, and TF‐IDF vectorizer with the ML algorithms, Kanagavalli et al 196 used classification based on bi‐directional long short term memory (BiLSTM), Jarrahi and Safari 197 introduced convolutional neural network in sentence‐level, many other authors 198‐201 also used various ML based approach for detecting fake news on OSNs.…”
Section: Ml‐based Solutions For Osn Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%