Abstract:Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on diversity training and examine the effect of power, privilege and politics on diversity in organisations. Design/methodology/approach -This is a conceptual paper examining the arguments in favour and against diversity training in organisations. It identifies the presence of dominant groups in society leading to the marginalisation and oppression of minority diverse groups. It introduces the papers to the special issue under the three themes of: … Show more
“…Diversity training for managers includes avoiding discrimination in recruitment and promotion, and general diversity training for all staff focuses on the theme of inclusion for all groups at work (Dobbin, Kim, & Kalev, 2011). McGuire and Bagher (2010) highlight a detailed set of priorities of diversity training at individual, group, and organizational levels. At the individual level they suggest diversity education, promoting an understanding of the effects of power and privilege, harnessing positive attitudes, and assisting individuals in overcoming inequality barriers.…”
Section: Implications For Hrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many of the practices highlighted by McGuire and Bagher (2010) would help to address EI and women’s disadvantages explored in this article, the practice of mentoring for women is deemed integral to this approach. Mentoring provides opportunities for social support, advice, learning and development, visibility, exposure, and enhanced self-efficacy (e.g., Kram, 1985) and is seen as a valuable career development tool for women.…”
Drawing on a sociological analysis considering gender, this article explores how emotional intelligence (EI) abilities are socially constructed and valued. It presents a range of societal trends including “the future is female” to explore how both men and women are perceived and judged against symbolic representations of masculine and feminine when they perform gendered conceptions of EI. The article illuminates how women and men may be encouraged to take up feminine and masculine interpretations of EI skills but women fare less well. It then examines the effects of EI’s assessment and therapeutic methods in training and work-based use. It argues that these approaches are damaging to individuals when deployed in work environments where masculinized management resides as the dominant framework. Finally, the article discusses the findings in relation to HRD to reveal important theoretical guidelines for practice.
“…Diversity training for managers includes avoiding discrimination in recruitment and promotion, and general diversity training for all staff focuses on the theme of inclusion for all groups at work (Dobbin, Kim, & Kalev, 2011). McGuire and Bagher (2010) highlight a detailed set of priorities of diversity training at individual, group, and organizational levels. At the individual level they suggest diversity education, promoting an understanding of the effects of power and privilege, harnessing positive attitudes, and assisting individuals in overcoming inequality barriers.…”
Section: Implications For Hrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many of the practices highlighted by McGuire and Bagher (2010) would help to address EI and women’s disadvantages explored in this article, the practice of mentoring for women is deemed integral to this approach. Mentoring provides opportunities for social support, advice, learning and development, visibility, exposure, and enhanced self-efficacy (e.g., Kram, 1985) and is seen as a valuable career development tool for women.…”
Drawing on a sociological analysis considering gender, this article explores how emotional intelligence (EI) abilities are socially constructed and valued. It presents a range of societal trends including “the future is female” to explore how both men and women are perceived and judged against symbolic representations of masculine and feminine when they perform gendered conceptions of EI. The article illuminates how women and men may be encouraged to take up feminine and masculine interpretations of EI skills but women fare less well. It then examines the effects of EI’s assessment and therapeutic methods in training and work-based use. It argues that these approaches are damaging to individuals when deployed in work environments where masculinized management resides as the dominant framework. Finally, the article discusses the findings in relation to HRD to reveal important theoretical guidelines for practice.
“…This finding highlights the importance of promoting diversity among faculty and staff. According to McGuire and Bagher (2010), universities that promote diversity and value their staff competencies by focusing on effective cultural awareness training aligned with their values and strategic objectives, can enhance performance and have the ability to recruit the most skilled faculty and staff. The majority of faculty and administrators at both universities endorsed diversity, seeing it as a determinant of increased performance.…”
While a growing number of research studies on diversity in higher educational institutions provide a broad evidence for the positive influence that workforce diversity has on performance, this study drawn from one American (n = 539) and one middle eastern (n = 145) university revealed that cultural diversity and equality and diversity were positively related to organisational performance in both universities. Our hypothesised relationship between multicultural diversity and performance was not supported in the middle eastern university; this is due to the fact that even when non-western universities use the US model, they still confront many challenges resulting from the lack of completely not partially integrating the US model in the whole strategy of the university.
“…Diversity has now become part of every workplace, it has become necessary to learn, respect, and value differences on a daily basis. With the dual effects of workplace globalization and workplace mobility increasing, diversity training is becoming a more pressing priority for human resource development (HRD) to minimize harassment, foster greater equality, inclusion and fairness at the workplace (McGuire and Bagher, 2010). Employees must learn through each other's experiences to get a better understanding about the similarities and differences.…”
Section: Strategies To Manage Workplace Bullyingmentioning
PurposeThis paper aims to outline the nature of workplace bullying and its implications for employees and the organization, and strategies to handle such unwanted behavior.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on work carried out by the authors over the past two years, plus the HR literature.FindingsThe paper argues that if workplace bullying is not managed well, then it will have serious negative implications on workers and the overall performance of the organization, thus a happy, healthy and engaged workforce will not be achievable. Strategies relating to education and training, leadership, sound processes and overall support for victims are ways in which undesirable acts in the organization could be managed.Practical implicationsThe paper draws attention to the important issue of workplace bullying and its effects on workers and the organization, and mentions the significance of managing it.Social implicationsThe paper explains how the management of any organization can be improved to generate a better working environment.Originality/valueThe paper presents the arguments in a condensed and easy‐to‐digest format.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.