1992
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of tick species biting humans in an emerging area for Lyme disease.

Abstract: BACKGROUND. Although most tick bites in humans in areas of the northeastern United States in which Lyme disease is highly endemic are due to Ixodes dammini, no study documents the frequency of I. dammini bites in low-prevalence or emerging areas for Lyme disease. Data on the proportion of tick bites in humans that are due to I. dammini in a region may have implications for public health policy and clinical management. METHODS. A statewide survey of the tick species that parasitized humans in Maine was conducte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biting of humans by I. dentatus is extremely rare in comparison to the numbers of bites people receive from I. scapularis and D. variabilis in the United States (16,51) and has been reported for at least 19 people across Michigan (61, 63); North Carolina (27); West Virginia (22); Washington, DC (53); Connecticut (2); and Maine (31). Given the paucity of direct human biting by the cryptic vector, epidemiological significance of a cryptic cycle is contingent upon the presence of a bridging vector that will share hosts with the cryptic vector and bridge the pathogen to humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biting of humans by I. dentatus is extremely rare in comparison to the numbers of bites people receive from I. scapularis and D. variabilis in the United States (16,51) and has been reported for at least 19 people across Michigan (61, 63); North Carolina (27); West Virginia (22); Washington, DC (53); Connecticut (2); and Maine (31). Given the paucity of direct human biting by the cryptic vector, epidemiological significance of a cryptic cycle is contingent upon the presence of a bridging vector that will share hosts with the cryptic vector and bridge the pathogen to humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work documents the establishment of I. scapularis populations followed by the emergence of B. burgdorferi on an island on the coast of Maine where neither had previously been found (Rand et al 1991;Smith et al 1992). In this report, we include the unique description of the evolution of B. burgdorferi strain diversity within a newly established population of hard ticks in the isolated setting of island ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, nymphs recovered from humans included both I. scapularis and Ixodes cookei Packard in Connecticut (Magnarelli and Anderson 1989), both I. scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (L.) in New York and Maryland (Falco 1987, Falco and Fish 1988b, Armstrong et al 2001), and multiple Ixodes spp.— I. cookei, I. scapularis, Ixodes marxi Banks, and Ixodes muris (Bishopp and Smith)—in Maine (Smith et al 1992). Moreover, I. cookei has been reported to bite humans also in Michigan, New York, Vermont, and West Virginia (Hall et al 1991, Sood et al 1997, Walker et al 1998, Lubelczyk et al 2010), and bites by A. americanum occurs commonly in the Mid-Atlantic States (Merten and Durden 2000, Schulze et al 2006, Rossi et al 2015).…”
Section: Risk Measures Based On Collection Of Ticks From Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, I. cookei has been reported to bite humans also in Michigan, New York, Vermont, and West Virginia (Hall et al 1991, Sood et al 1997, Walker et al 1998, Lubelczyk et al 2010), and bites by A. americanum occurs commonly in the Mid-Atlantic States (Merten and Durden 2000, Schulze et al 2006, Rossi et al 2015). Ixodes scapularis accounted for most (83–94%) of the nymphs recovered from humans in Connecticut and New York (Magnarelli and Anderson 1989, Falco 1987, Falco and Fish 1988b), whereas they made up only a small proportion (<10%) of the human-biting nymphs in Maine and Maryland (Smith et al 1992, Armstrong et al 2001). Based on data from United States Armed Forces personnel, which may be less reflective of residential settings as compared with the data from civilians presented above, I. scapularis (with no distinction with regards to life stage) accounted for 79–92% of recognized human bites in the Connecticut-Rhode Island-New York-Massachusetts area; ~45% of bites in the Minnesota-Wisconsin-Ohio area; 10–20% of bites in the Mid-Atlantic States of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Washington D.C., and Virginia (northern part of the state); and 2–7% of bites in southern Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina (Rossi et al 2015).…”
Section: Risk Measures Based On Collection Of Ticks From Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%