Diversity of the Family Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Tropical Dry Forest of Mexico, I. Sierra de Huautla, Morelos

Noguera, Felipe A.; Zaragoza‐Caballero, Santiago; Chemsak, John A.; Rodríguez-Palafox, Alicia; Ramírez, Enrique; González-Soriano, Enrique; Ayala, Ricardo

doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0617:dotfcc]2.0.co;2

Cited by 54 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The other, in the highlands of the Mexican Transition Zone, where seven generalized tracks and three nodes were established, is associated to montane forests in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt and tropical dry forests of the Balsas Basin biogeographic province. In general, Cerambycidae in Mexico have been better collected in the tropical dry forests than in other kinds of vegetation (Chemsak & Noguera 1993;Noguera et al 2002;Toledo et al 2002).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Track analysis of the Mexican species of Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera)

Toledo

Corona

Morrone

2007

Rev. Bras. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Track analysis of the Mexican species of Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera)

Toledo

Corona

Morrone

2007

Rev. Bras. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…, 1979, 1989; Nelson et al. , 1981; Westcott, 1983, 1998; Barr, 1992; Noguera, 1993, 2002; Westcott & Noguera, 1993; Bellamy & Westcott, 1995, 1996, 2000; Nelson & Bellamy, 1996, 2004; Bellamy, 1997; Chemsak & Noguera, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2003; Giesbert & Chemsak, 1997; Noguera & Chemsak, 1997; Toledo, 1997, 2005a,b; McCarty, 2001; Bellamy & Hespenheide, 2002; Chemsak & Hovore, 2002; Noguera et al. , 2002; Davidson, 2003; Corona, 2005; Corona & Toledo, 2006; Cuevas, 2006; Márquez & Asiain, 2006; Morón, 2006; Reyes‐Castillo et al.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the Trans‐mexican Volcanic Belt represent a natural biogeographical unit? An analysis of the distributional patterns of Coleoptera

Corona

Toledo

Morrone

2007

Journal of Biogeography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim We analysed the geographical distribution of beetle species of the families Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Dryophthoridae, Melolonthidae, Passalidae and Staphylinidae from the Trans‐mexican Volcanic Belt (TVB) through a track analysis and a parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE), in order to test its naturalness and determine its affinities. Location The area analysed corresponds to the TVB, which is a biogeographical province of the Mexican Transition Zone. Methods The panbiogeographical analysis was based on the comparison of the individual tracks of 299 species of Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Dryophthoridae, Melolonthidae, Passalidae and Staphylinidae (Coleoptera). The TVB was divided into 1o × 1o grid cells and we also included in the analysis the remaining Mexican biogeographical provinces. Parsimony analysis of endemicity with progressive character elimination (PAE‐PCE) was applied to classify areas by their shared taxa according to the most parsimonious cladograms. The nested sets of areas were represented as generalized tracks. Results Three generalized tracks were obtained: (1) grid cells 9C, 9D, 10D, 10E, Sierra Madre Oriental, Chiapas, Mexican Gulf and the Sierra Madre del Sur; (2) grid cells 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5C, 6C, 7C, Sierra Madre Occidental, Sierra Madre del Sur, Balsas Basin and the Mexican Pacific Coast, and (3) grid cells 8D, 9C, 9D, 10D, 10E, Yucatán Peninsula, Chiapas, Sierra Madre Oriental and the Mexican Gulf. Main conclusions We conclude that the TVB does not represent a natural biogeographical unit because it shows different relationships with other biogeographical provinces, being clearly transitional between the Nearctic and Neotropical provinces. Some parts of the TVB are related to Neotropical provinces (Chiapas, Mexican Gulf and Mexican Pacific Coast) and others to the remaining provinces of the Mexican Transition Zone (Sierra Madre Oriental, Sierra Madre del Sur, Sierra Madre Occidental and Balsas Basin).

show abstract

“…Anaglyptini Gistel, 1848 has not been used as valid after 1899 to our knowledge and its usage threatens both Anaglyptini Lacordaire, 1868 in Cerambycidae and Chalcophorina Lacordaire, 1857 in Buprestidae. Anaglyptini Lacordaire has been used as the valid name for this group in the following 26 publications, published by more than ten authors in the immediately preceding 50 years and encompassing a span of more than ten years: Chemsak and Linsley (1974), Micheli (1983), Bílý and Mehl (1989), MacRae (1993), Monné (1993d), Lingafelter and Horner (1993), Monné and Giesbert (1995), Yanega (1996), Schiefer (1998), Arnett (2000), Ortuño and Peláez (2001), Vives (2001), Vlasak and Vlasakova (2002), Peña (2002), Noguera et al (2002), Turnbow and Thomas (2002) (Aurivillius 1912: 155). Tribe Auxesini Lepesme and Breuning, 1952 Auxésides Lacordaire, 1872: 463 (based on Auxesis Thomson, 1858).…”

Section: Tribe Agallissini Leconte 1873mentioning

confidence: 99%

Catalogue of family-group names in Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)

Bousquet

Heffern²,

Bouchard

et al. 2009

Zootaxa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Family-group names proposed for beetles belonging to the family Cerambycidae are catalogued and their availability is determined using the rules of the current International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. A synoptic classification of the family summarizes the validity of the names. Type genera of all family-group names are listed and the type species and stems of genera of available family-group names are included. A new family-group name, Elytracanthinini Bousquet (type genus: Elytracanthina Monn, 2005, a replacement name for Elytracantha Lane, 1955) is proposed for Elytracanthinae Lane, 1955. Ichthyosoma armatum Montrouzier, 1855 is designated as type species of Icthyosoma Boisduval, 1835. Reversal of precedence is used to preserve the validity of the following family-group names: Anaglyptides Lacordaire, 1868 (over Anaglyptisidae Gistel, 1848 [Buprestidae]); Dryobiini Arnett, 1962 (over Dryobiadae Gistel, 1856 [Ptinidae]); Hemilophitae Thomson, 1868 (over Amphionychitae Thomson, 1860) and Hétéropsides Lacordaire, 1869 (over Dichophyiaeidae Gistel, 1848). The following family-group names, although junior synonyms, are preserved as valid until an application is submitted to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature; in these cases a reversal of precedence could not be applied: Eurypodini Gahan, 1906 (over Zaracinae Pascoe, 1869); Macronides Lacordaire, 1868 (over Enchapteritae Thomson, 1861); Pyresthides Lacordaire, 1868 (over Pseudolepturitae Thomson, 1861 and Erythrinae Pascoe, 1866) and Stenoderinae Pascoe, 1867 (over Syllitae Thomson, 1864). A total of 238 valid cerambycid family-group names (413 available names) are recognized in the following 13 subfamilies: Vesperinae (1 valid family-group name), Oxypeltinae (1), Disteniinae (4), Anoplodermatinae (3), Philinae (1), Parandrinae (2), Prioninae (24), Spondylidinae (5), Necydalinae (1), Lepturinae (8), Lamiinae (80), Dorcasominae (1), and Cerambycinae (107).

show abstract

Diversity of the Family Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Tropical Dry Forest of Mexico, I. Sierra de Huautla, Morelos

Cited by 54 publications

References 6 publications

Track analysis of the Mexican species of Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera)

Track analysis of the Mexican species of Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera)

Does the Trans‐mexican Volcanic Belt represent a natural biogeographical unit? An analysis of the distributional patterns of Coleoptera

Catalogue of family-group names in Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About