2005
DOI: 10.1128/jb.187.8.2638-2650.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of Genome Structure inSalmonella entericaSerovar Typhi Populations

Abstract: The genomes of most strains of Salmonella and Escherichia coli are highly conserved. In contrast, all 136 wild-type strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi analyzed by partial digestion with I-CeuI (an endonuclease which cuts within the rrn operons) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and by PCR have rearrangements due to homologous recombination between the rrn operons leading to inversions and translocations. Recombination between rrn operons in culture is known to be equally frequent in S. enterica se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and Table 1). The phage type is largely independent from the genome type, as shown in other studies (15). Nevertheless, the occurrence of a particular combination of genome type and phage type was predominant in two phylogenetic clusters.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 and Table 1). The phage type is largely independent from the genome type, as shown in other studies (15). Nevertheless, the occurrence of a particular combination of genome type and phage type was predominant in two phylogenetic clusters.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The D value for this study was 0.870. We compared the D value of SNP typing to those of MLST (13) and ribotyping (15), both of which used global isolates, as no comparable data set is available for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, the "gold standard" for the comparison of the powers of typing methods (29). MLST and ribotyping had D values of 0.503 and 0.873, respectively.…”
Section: T T C a T T A A T G T T T T T Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, selective constraints that prevent chromosomal rearrangements may no longer apply to host-restricted Salmonella serovars. This might explain why major genomic rearrangements owing to homologous recombination between the rrn operons are a characteristic feature of the chromosomes of S. Typhi isolates Sanderson 1995, 1996;Kothapalli et al 2005;Matthews et al 2010). Similar genome rearrangements are also found in other host-restricted lineages within the genus Salmonella, including S. Paratyphi C, S. Gallinarum, and S. Typhimurium phage type DT2 (Liu and Sanderson 1998;Helm et al 2004;Wu et al 2005;Liu et al 2007).…”
Section: Genomic Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, it seems conceivable that bile-induced DNA damage might play a role in the evolution of Salmonella populations in the gall bladder. For instance, the genome rearrangements commonly found in S. typhi strains (Echeita and Usera 1998;Ng et al 1999;Kothapalli et al 2005) might be favored by exposure to bile salts, whose ability to induce DNA rearrangements has been previously shown (Prieto et al 2004). Bile-induced mutagenesis might also increase the polymorphism of Salmonella populations in the harsh environment of the mammalian gall bladder, perhaps providing an example of stressinduced genetic variability (Rosenberg and Hastings 2003;Saint-Ruf and Matic 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%