2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of European habitat types is correlated with geography more than climate and human pressure

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), temperate and optimal climate for mammals, plenty of habitat diversity, prey abundance 3 , 28 – 33 Europe Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Austria, Italy, Slovenia, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Moldova, Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Montenegro, Bulgaria, North Macedonia, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belarus Close to Anthropocene (parks, bird feeders, etc. ), temperate and optimal climate for mammals, plenty of habitat diversity, prey abundance 3 , 28 , 31 , 32 , 34 Central America Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, several island states Pristine tropical habitats, extraordinary habitat diversity, a high number of different possible ecological niches, and prey abundance 35 – 38 Northwestern Africa Morocco, North Algeria, Tunisia High human impact (benefits of living close to the Anthropocene), ideal for arid-loving species (predominately ground squirrels) 39 , 40 Western Asia Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Western Russia, Northern India, Nepal, Bhutan High habitat diversity with significant altitude changes. Hotspots are often observed close to areas with high human impact 7 , 40 , 41 Most eastern Asia South Korea, Japan, Taiwan Close to Anthropocene (parks, bird feeders, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), temperate and optimal climate for mammals, plenty of habitat diversity, prey abundance 3 , 28 – 33 Europe Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Austria, Italy, Slovenia, Poland, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Moldova, Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Montenegro, Bulgaria, North Macedonia, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belarus Close to Anthropocene (parks, bird feeders, etc. ), temperate and optimal climate for mammals, plenty of habitat diversity, prey abundance 3 , 28 , 31 , 32 , 34 Central America Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, several island states Pristine tropical habitats, extraordinary habitat diversity, a high number of different possible ecological niches, and prey abundance 35 – 38 Northwestern Africa Morocco, North Algeria, Tunisia High human impact (benefits of living close to the Anthropocene), ideal for arid-loving species (predominately ground squirrels) 39 , 40 Western Asia Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Western Russia, Northern India, Nepal, Bhutan High habitat diversity with significant altitude changes. Hotspots are often observed close to areas with high human impact 7 , 40 , 41 Most eastern Asia South Korea, Japan, Taiwan Close to Anthropocene (parks, bird feeders, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hotspots are often observed close to areas with high human impact 7 , 40 , 41 Most eastern Asia South Korea, Japan, Taiwan Close to Anthropocene (parks, bird feeders, etc. ), temperate and optimal climate for mammals, plenty of habitat diversity, prey abundance 3 , 28 , 31 , 32 , 34 Southeast Asia Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Brunei, Malaysia, Philippines Pristine tropical habitats, extraordinary habitat diversity, a high number of different possible ecological niches, and prey abundance 42 – 48 Tropical Africa Ethiopia, Western Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Congo, DRC, Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, South Sudan, Southwestern CAR, Nigeria, Benin, Togo, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea Pristine tropical habitats, extraordinary habitat diversity, a high number of different possible ecological niches, and prey abundance 49 52 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we ran as many GBM models as the combinations, increasing the n.trees value from 10,000 to 20,000 but keeping the train.fraction = 0.8 and the cv.folds = 10 fixed. We finally chose the set of parameters resulting in the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) ( Friedman, 2001 ; Greenwell, Boehmke & Cunningham, 2019 ; Cervellini et al, 2021 ). To investigate possible spatial autocorrelation in predictions from the optimized GBM model, which could have resulted for instance from sampling bias affecting N. lasiopterus occurrence data ( Roberts et al, 2017 ), we fitted an additional set of 10 GBM models, using the tuned set of parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explain variation in GME in these countries in relation to two fundamental national characteristics: per capita gross domestic product (GDP) and area. One could also expect greater GME in southern Europe in recognition of greater habitat diversity, species endemicity and biodiversity hotspots than in the north 31 , 32 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%