2020
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity is richness: why data reporting according to sex, age, and ethnicity matters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding other outcomes, we were able to describe that women have more heart failure, pulmonary edema, major bleeding, and stroke, with a marginal increase in cardiogenic shock in STEMI, while these differences blunted with NSTEMI and persisted only for major bleeding and mortality. These factors may be explained from many perspectives, but biologically they may be caused by different responses to drugs that are administered for ACS, hormonal differences, and body composition [2][3][4]. Along with the biological explanations, socioeconomic and demographic factors might contribute to the presence of adverse outcomes [7,8] because of education, transport, or medical services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding other outcomes, we were able to describe that women have more heart failure, pulmonary edema, major bleeding, and stroke, with a marginal increase in cardiogenic shock in STEMI, while these differences blunted with NSTEMI and persisted only for major bleeding and mortality. These factors may be explained from many perspectives, but biologically they may be caused by different responses to drugs that are administered for ACS, hormonal differences, and body composition [2][3][4]. Along with the biological explanations, socioeconomic and demographic factors might contribute to the presence of adverse outcomes [7,8] because of education, transport, or medical services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), despite advancements in treatment during the last decades, women continue to have worse short-and long-term outcomes than men [2,3]. Several studies have revealed sex-specific differences in AMI regarding clinical presentation, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnosis, management, and outcomes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Nevertheless, women remain understudied, as they only represent about 20% of the patients enrolled in AMI clinical trials [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been reported elsewhere in Asian populations [ 42 , 43 ]. Of note, this evidence is relevant because Asian populations have historically been under-represented in both observational and randomized studies [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the Journal actively supports equality, diversity and inclusion of sex, gender, age, ethnicity, or geographical diversity, and encourages considering this diversity when reporting and analysing data of studies, registries, and trials (10). The Journal aims to maintain and expand the diversity of its Editorial oard, Reviewer pool and Authors.…”
Section: Pursuit Of Rigour and Transparencymentioning
confidence: 98%