2009
DOI: 10.1890/08-1684.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity–interaction modeling: estimating contributions of species identities and interactions to ecosystem function

Abstract: Abstract. We develop a modeling framework that estimates the effects of species identity and diversity on ecosystem function and permits prediction of the diversity-function relationship across different types of community composition. Rather than just measure an overall effect of diversity, we separately estimate the contributions of different species interactions. This is especially important when both positive and negative interactions occur or where there are patterns in the interactions. Based on differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
264
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
264
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…augmented with terms for interactions with harvest year or harvest occasion (Kirwan et al 2007(Kirwan et al , 2009. Sown proportions of P. pratense, L. perenne, T. pratense, C. intybus, Oecologia (2012) 169:793-802 795 and M. sativa were denoted G 1 , G 2 , L, DF, and DL, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…augmented with terms for interactions with harvest year or harvest occasion (Kirwan et al 2007(Kirwan et al , 2009. Sown proportions of P. pratense, L. perenne, T. pratense, C. intybus, Oecologia (2012) 169:793-802 795 and M. sativa were denoted G 1 , G 2 , L, DF, and DL, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of species in a system increases so does the number of possible interactions, either positive or negative thus affecting assembly [21][23]. We know from many biodiversity experiments that niche complementarity between species varying in traits can lead to better overall resource-use at community level, and that particular combinations of functional groups (particularly N 2 -fixers combined with grasses) as well as species- and functional group richness can drive positive diversity effects [17][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional explanation for richness-productivity relationships is that larger assemblages of species have a greater probability of including species that have low niche overlap and thus can access different resources (1,21). This complementarity in resource use may be estimated by quantifying the performance of species i in polyculture against the expected performance from its monocultures (22,23). Polycultures also might appear more productive compared with monocultures via a selection effect-if highly productive species dominate the polyculture, displacing lowproductivity species (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%