There now is ample experimental evidence that speciose assemblages are more productive and provide a greater amount of ecosystem services than depauperate ones. However, these experiments often conclude that there is a higher probability of including complementary species combinations in assemblages with more species and lack a priori prediction about which species combinations maximize function. Here, I report the results of an experiment manipulating the evolutionary relatedness of constituent plant species across a richness gradient. I show that assemblages with distantly related species contributed most to the higher biomass production in multispecies assemblages, through species complementarity. Species produced more biomass than predicted from their monocultures when they were in plots with distantly related species and produced the amount of biomass predicted from monoculture when sown with close relatives. This finding suggests that in the absence of any other information, combining distantly related species in restored or managed landscapes may serve to maximize biomass production and carbon sequestration, thus merging calls to conserve evolutionary history and maximize ecosystem function.biodiversity | phylogenetic diversity | transgressive overyielding E vidence showing that ecosystem function is positively related to the number of species in an assemblage (1-7) has profoundly changed how scientists and policy makers view the potential impact of species extinction (8, 9). However, not all species contribute equally to emergent functioning of an assemblage. How much species uniquely contribute to ecosystem functioning depends on several different aspects of species ecologies, including how variable their population dynamics are (10-12) and how susceptible they are to local extinction (13), as well as how much they overlap in their resource requirements (14, 15) and the relative distinctiveness of species in multivariate functional trait space (16,17).Measuring the meaningful differences in species' ecologies, across large numbers of species, has proven difficult. However, the simple assumption that the more time that has passed since two species shared a common ancestor, the higher the probability they have ecologically diverged appears to provide a powerful explanation for how biodiversity affects ecosystem function (15,(18)(19)(20). Previous analyses of the relationship between plant evolutionary history and biomass production used existing experiments that manipulated species richness. These experiments often were biased toward distantly related species, as experimenters chose to include representatives of disparate lineages (e.g., a grass or a nitrogen fixer); thus, the observed relationship between evolutionary history and productivity may have been driven by the relatively few close relatives used in these experiments (19).Further, previous analyses of the relationship between phylogenetic diversity (PD) and ecosystem function relied on the untested assumption that distantly related species are m...