2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in the Last Decade of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery: A Descriptive Analysis of Leadership and Future Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,19 The Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) created a Diversity and Inclusion Task Force which demonstrated that between 2008-2018, women comprised only 25% and non-Caucasians 10% of all APDS leadership positions. 20 In our current study, these clinical and educational leadership positions were considered important stepping stones on the path to a chair position. Increasing diversity in surgical leadership needs to start with encouragement, mentorship, sponsorship, education in those areas not traditionally included in medical education, and promotion of minority representation at the trainee and junior faculty levels to improve equity in candidates for progressive leadership roles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…18,19 The Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) created a Diversity and Inclusion Task Force which demonstrated that between 2008-2018, women comprised only 25% and non-Caucasians 10% of all APDS leadership positions. 20 In our current study, these clinical and educational leadership positions were considered important stepping stones on the path to a chair position. Increasing diversity in surgical leadership needs to start with encouragement, mentorship, sponsorship, education in those areas not traditionally included in medical education, and promotion of minority representation at the trainee and junior faculty levels to improve equity in candidates for progressive leadership roles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…All studies retrieved were written in English. All included studies were comprised of national audits (n = 6), 22‐27 organisational audits (n = 4), 28‐31 consensus methodology (n = 1), 32 narrative reviews (n = 7), 8,30,33‐37 university audits (n = 3), 34,37,38 project audits (n = 7), 33,37,39‐43 viewpoints (n = 8), 2,3,18,44‐48 simulation experiments (n = 3), 49‐51 case surveys (n = 5) 52‐56 and a position paper (n = 1) 15 . Studies centred on ethnic minorities in the United States of America, 2,3,15,22,24‐28,30‐34,36,37,41‐59 China, 24 Switzerland 60 and United Kingdom 18 ; women who identified as an ethnic minority 25,28,38 ; Indigenous peoples 14,35,40,61 ; both ethnic minorities and Indigenous peoples 2,57 ; and people with low socio‐economic status 23,48 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review of all medical and surgical specialties demonstrates that there is under‐representation of ethnic minorities worldwide 2,22,25,27,38 . This is particularly true in all surgical specialties, 22 academic medical appointments 31 and academic surgical appointments 28 . Minimal progress has been made in increasing ethnic minority and Indigenous health workforce representation in the last 20 years 22 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 , 62 , 63 Over a 10-year period, the probabilities of promotion were lower and probabilities of attrition were higher for UIM faculty and women. 41 UIM physicians are less likely to hold administrative leadership positions in various departments, 3 , 64 66 serve as program directors, 67 , 68 receive NIH research awards, 3 grants, 26 and receive tenure 69 than their non-UIM peers. Even after adjusting for tenure status, degree, gender, and NIH award status, UIM faculty have significantly longer time to promotion when compared to their White counterparts.…”
Section: Retention Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%