2003
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-3-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in coding tandem repeats in related Neisseria spp.

Abstract: Background: Tandem repeats contained within coding regions can mediate phase variation when the repeated units change the reading frame of the coding sequence in a copy number dependent manner. Coding tandem repeats are those which do not alter the reading frame with copy number, and the changes in copy number of these repeats may then potentially alter the function or antigenicity of the protein encoded. Three complete neisserial genomes were analyzed and compared to identify coding tandem repeats where the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidences in support of such proposition are made available from studies in humans [32,33]. Jordan et al [34] also endorsed similar observations and conclusions on the basis of their cross-species comparisons in Neisseria spp., and suggested the significance of this phenomenon in providing adaptability to the host. This view later also got support from Verstrepen et al [35] and Levdansky et al [36] following their studies in yeast and Aspergillus fumigatus, respectively.…”
Section: Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Evidences in support of such proposition are made available from studies in humans [32,33]. Jordan et al [34] also endorsed similar observations and conclusions on the basis of their cross-species comparisons in Neisseria spp., and suggested the significance of this phenomenon in providing adaptability to the host. This view later also got support from Verstrepen et al [35] and Levdansky et al [36] following their studies in yeast and Aspergillus fumigatus, respectively.…”
Section: Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We identified a greater percentage of genes (9%) containing VNTR polymorphisms in the P. falciparum genome than has been reported for any other species to date (Bowen et al 2005; Coil et al 2008; Jordan et al 2003; Levdansky et al 2007; O’Dushlaine et al 2005; Verstrepen et al 2005). These current findings are expected to be an underestimate due to several factors: (1) This analysis compared three genomes and we expect variation in the genomes of other parasite strains; (2) 1,111 or 20% of the predicted 3D7 P. falciparum transcript sequences could not be mapped to a homolog; (3) TRs were bioinformatically recognized in each individual parasite sequence and subsequently compared for copy number, causing us to miss examples of one or zero TR “copies” (i.e., a sequence present zero or one times is not recognized as a TR in the initial bioinformatic step); (4) The VNTR analysis was limited to repeat sizes that would be considered minisatellites (≥12 nt repeat unit) to monitor how variable larger repeats are.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…(Jordan et al 2003), and humans (O’Dushlaine et al 2005). The reported percentage of ORFs with VNTRs varies in different species ranging from <0.01% in L. pneumophila to approximately 4.3% in S. cerevisiae .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 were analysed using ACEDB (R. Durbin, J.T. Thierry-Mieg, unpublished data, http://www.acedb.org) as described previously [37,55,63,64]. Perfect sequence repeats characteristic of phase variable genes were identified using ARRAYFINDER [65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeats, the annotations from all four neisserial genome sequences, and other sequence features were displayed in their sequence context within ACEDB. Analysis of the potential for simple sequence repeats to generate transcriptional or translational phase variation was determined through analysis of the repeat in the sequence context, as has been done previously [37,55,63,64]. Unique genes were identified as those for which no homology was displayed, the display parameters within ACEDB being set to 1e−50 for DNA identity, and 1e−4 for amino acid similarity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%