Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Gastroenterology and Hepatology: A Survey of Where We Stand

Abstract

In the setting of increasing attention to representation in medicine, we aimed to assess current perspectives of racial and ethnic workforce diversity and health care disparities among gastroenterology (GI) and hepatology professionals in the United States. METHODS:We developed and administered a 33-item electronic cross-sectional survey to members of 5 national GI and hepatology societies. Survey items were organized into thematic modules and solicited perspectives on racial and ethnic workforce diversity, health care disparities in GI and hepatology, and potential interventions to enhance workforce diversity and improve health equity. RESULTS:Of the 1,219 survey participants, 62.3% were male, 48.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 19.9% were from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine. The most frequently reported barriers to increasing racial and ethnic diversity in GI and hepatology were insufficient representation of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups in the education and training pipeline (n 5 431 [35.4%]), in professional leadership (n 5 340 [27.9%]), and among practicing GI and hepatology professionals (n 5 324 [26.6%]). Suggested interventions were to increase career mentorship opportunities (n 5 545 [44.7%]), medical student opportunities (n 5 520 [42.7%]), and program and professional society leadership roles for underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups (n 5 473 [38.8%]). DISCUSSION:Our survey explored imperative and timely perspectives on racial and ethnic representation and health equity among professionals in GI and hepatology. The findings should inform future interventions to address workforce diversity and establish priorities toward improving health equity, ultimately serving as a springboard for professional societies, academic institutions, and other organizations that aim to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in our field.

Parental leave, childcare policies, and workplace bias for hepatology professionals: A national survey

“…First, the response rate of 7.7% is low but is consistent with other studies distributed through large email contact lists without incentives for participation. 41 , 42 In addition, the representativeness of our sample size is limited by a lack of gender diversity, with no respondents reporting that they are nonbinary, as well as an overrepresentation of female and White respondents. Furthermore, several of our findings may be reflective of medical training more broadly and may not be unique to hepatology.…”