2003
DOI: 10.1002/mop.11020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity dual‐band planar inverted‐F antenna for WLAN operation

Abstract: A printed diversity dual-band planar inverted-F antenna (PIFA) mounted vertically at the edge of a PCMCIA network card (such that the protruded portion of the network card from the housing of the laptop has a minimum length) for WLAN operation in the 2.4-GHz band (2400 -2484 MHz) and 5.2-GHz band (5150 -5350 MHz) is presented. The diversity antenna studied comprises two back-to-back stacked PIFAs and has a low profile of 10 mm to the network card. Across the two operating bands, the measured reflection coeffi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For laptop computer applications, the WLAN MIMO operation requires a compact antenna array having enhanced isolation between the antennas and good radiation efficiencies for the antennas as well. The related isolation techniques that have been reported include the use of a T-shaped ground plane between the antennas [1], a ground wall and a connecting line added between the antennas [2], two PIFAs with their shorting strips or plates oriented to face each other [3], slot resonators embedded in the ground plane between the antennas to decrease the effects of the excited surface currents flowing from one port to another [4], and so on. However, the WLAN antennas applied in these studies may not be compact or suitable for the internal laptop computer antenna applications or the applied isolation techniques are not promising to achieve improved isolation in multiple operating bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For laptop computer applications, the WLAN MIMO operation requires a compact antenna array having enhanced isolation between the antennas and good radiation efficiencies for the antennas as well. The related isolation techniques that have been reported include the use of a T-shaped ground plane between the antennas [1], a ground wall and a connecting line added between the antennas [2], two PIFAs with their shorting strips or plates oriented to face each other [3], slot resonators embedded in the ground plane between the antennas to decrease the effects of the excited surface currents flowing from one port to another [4], and so on. However, the WLAN antennas applied in these studies may not be compact or suitable for the internal laptop computer antenna applications or the applied isolation techniques are not promising to achieve improved isolation in multiple operating bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antenna 1 and 2 are also arranged to have their shorting arms facing to each other, which can decrease the antenna's near-field radiation in-between the two antennas and lead to smaller mutual coupling [3]. However, with a spacing (d) of 24 mm between the two antennas mounted along the top edge of a large ground plane in this study, there is large mutual coupling between the two antennas.…”
Section: Proposed Design Of Two Antennas With Improved Isolationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results clearly indicate that the case 1 arrangement shows optimal isolation between the two antennas; in this case, the isolation (S 21 ) is less than Ϫ20 dB for all operating frequencies over the GSM, DCS, and WLAN bands. This behavior is probably because the two integrated antennas in case 1 are arranged to be back to back with their shorting strips facing each other, such that better shielding effects between the two antennas are obtained [8,9].The isolation behavior between the two antennas with case 1 arrangement as a function of d is then studied. Figure 3 shows the measured and simulated reflection coefficients (S 11 for the GSM/ DCS antenna, S 22 for the WLAN antenna) and isolation (S 21 ) between the two antennas with d ϭ 11 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%