1963
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1963.1088732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity Combination of Fading Signals with Unequal Mean Strengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative perfusion map ( Q Map) was calculated as Qgoodbreak=normalFDQFDQ(blood)fQ22em[normalmlfalse/minfalse/normalml]$$ Q=\frac{\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{D}}_Q}{{\mathrm{F}\mathrm{D}}_Q\left(\mathrm{blood}\right)}\frac{f_Q}{2}\kern2em \left[\mathrm{ml}/\min /\mathrm{ml}\right] $$ where FDQ$$ {\mathrm{FD}}_Q $$ is the whole perfusion‐weighted image obtained via the FD analysis; FDQ(blood)$$ {\mathrm{FD}}_Q\left(\mathrm{blood}\right) $$ is the perfusion amplitude measured in a voxel completely filled with blood; and fQ$$ {f}_Q $$ is the number of heart beats per minute 1,6 . The combined functional maps were obtained from quantified functional maps of individual SGs by segmenting lung parenchyma with exclusion of large vessels, and combining maps via a linear weighted combination method, in which the weights were proportional to estimated SNR (i.e., maximal ratio combining) 44 in the lung parenchyma. The lung segmentation was performed semi‐automatically using a region‐growing algorithm, 45 and if needed, the region of interests were corrected manually 31 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantitative perfusion map ( Q Map) was calculated as Qgoodbreak=normalFDQFDQ(blood)fQ22em[normalmlfalse/minfalse/normalml]$$ Q=\frac{\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{D}}_Q}{{\mathrm{F}\mathrm{D}}_Q\left(\mathrm{blood}\right)}\frac{f_Q}{2}\kern2em \left[\mathrm{ml}/\min /\mathrm{ml}\right] $$ where FDQ$$ {\mathrm{FD}}_Q $$ is the whole perfusion‐weighted image obtained via the FD analysis; FDQ(blood)$$ {\mathrm{FD}}_Q\left(\mathrm{blood}\right) $$ is the perfusion amplitude measured in a voxel completely filled with blood; and fQ$$ {f}_Q $$ is the number of heart beats per minute 1,6 . The combined functional maps were obtained from quantified functional maps of individual SGs by segmenting lung parenchyma with exclusion of large vessels, and combining maps via a linear weighted combination method, in which the weights were proportional to estimated SNR (i.e., maximal ratio combining) 44 in the lung parenchyma. The lung segmentation was performed semi‐automatically using a region‐growing algorithm, 45 and if needed, the region of interests were corrected manually 31 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where FD Q is the whole perfusion-weighted image obtained via the FD analysis; FD Q (blood) is the perfusion amplitude measured in a voxel completely filled with blood; and f Q is the number of heart beats per minute. 1,6 The combined functional maps were obtained from quantified functional maps of individual SGs by segmenting lung parenchyma with exclusion of large vessels, and combining maps via a linear weighted combination method, in which the weights were proportional to estimated SNR (i.e., maximal ratio combining) 44 in the lung parenchyma.…”
Section: Image Postprocessing and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the sets of the random variables and are mutually statistically independent, one can show using (53) in Appendix A that if the phase estimates in all diversity branches are identical, then the decrease in the combiner's mean SNR is given by (12) where denotes the mathematical expectation. Using (56), the first two moments of the correlation loss functions can be expressed as (13) Equation 12gives the degradation in mean SNR of the combiner due to the noisy phase references. Most practical systems are usually designed to satisfy a certain SNR reliability level (i.e., the probability or percentage of time that the SNR exceeds a specified threshold [11]).…”
Section: Snr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of multipath delay, spread and fading of signals in the wireless environment is usually unavoidable [2,3]. Extreme fading of the signal amplitude and Inter Symbol Interference (ISI) introduced during the transmission through the conventional channel and the frequency selectivity of the channel appearing at the receiver side [4,5] are responsible for a high probability of errors and reduced overall performance of the system. Several methods like adaptive equalization and channel coding have been developed to reduce the above effect [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%