2020
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity and heterotic patterns in North American proprietary dent maize germplasm

Abstract: Publicly available maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines with expired Plant Variety Protection certificates (ex‐PVP) constitute the elite germplasm used in hybrids grown by North American farmers during the past half century. A set of 329 ex‐PVP inbreds and eight public reference inbreds was evaluated for genetic diversity using molecular marker and pedigree‐based relationships. The majority of inbreds originated from Dekalb Genetics Corporation, Holden's Foundation Seed, Pioneer Hi‐Bred International, and Syngenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) using these SNPs showed clear separation of the three major maize dent heterotic groups: Stiff Stalk, Iodent, and Non-Stiff Stalk (Figure 4a). The pattern observed in the PCAs are similar to other published results (Romay et al, 2013; van Heerwaarden et al, 2012; White et al, 2020) describing the separation of maize types. The clear separation of maize types from the WGS data gave us confidence in the genotypic data, and provided covariates to use in the GWAS to account for population structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) using these SNPs showed clear separation of the three major maize dent heterotic groups: Stiff Stalk, Iodent, and Non-Stiff Stalk (Figure 4a). The pattern observed in the PCAs are similar to other published results (Romay et al, 2013; van Heerwaarden et al, 2012; White et al, 2020) describing the separation of maize types. The clear separation of maize types from the WGS data gave us confidence in the genotypic data, and provided covariates to use in the GWAS to account for population structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and model-based clustering placed the majority of the lines in the BSSS or NSSS heterotic groups and subgroups as expected according to pedigree information (Mikel and Dudley, 2006;Nelson et al, 2008;Mikel, 2011;Beckett et al, 2017;White et al, 2020). However, there were a few exceptions: PHJ40, PHAA0, and PHRE1 were declared BSSS by Mikel and Dudley (2006), but our results from model-based clustering assigned them to NSSS.…”
Section: Genetic Structure Of Ex-pvp Linessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The M-Reid + P supergroup: includes M-Reid group (see Result) and many inbreds from the P group, which was developed at 1970s and 1980s by introgressing disease resistance genes from the North American germplasm, in particular, those from Pioneer Hybrids, such as, 78599, P3147, and P3382 into Chinese germplasm. The SS + Iodent + Lan supergroup contains many inbreds developed by US public research organizations, such as, B73 (SS) , Mo17 (Lan) in 70s and 80s and many ex-PVP inbreds introduced after 2000s, such as PH207 (Iodent) 14 , 19 , 43 .
Figure 8 Heterotic groups of 490 inbred lines in CSM region.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%