2022
DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2022.2132079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversities and dynamics in the governance of religion: inter-regional comparative themes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This first point relates essentially to the tension between the universal character of the neutrality principle, as framed in the Convention, and the not-so-universal interpretations given by each particular democracy. Although the notion of state religious neutrality can legitimately be derived from the rights and ideals enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights (Ringelheim 2017) whereby states are under the obligation to ensure that the principle of state neutrality vis-à-vis religion and belief is respected, in reality, as shown by different scholars in Europe, there are many different interpretations of what neutrality means since the relationship between state and religion is constructed and understood differently in different European democracies (Smet 2022;Robbers 2004;Sealy and Modood 2022).…”
Section: The Contested Nature Of "Neutrality"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This first point relates essentially to the tension between the universal character of the neutrality principle, as framed in the Convention, and the not-so-universal interpretations given by each particular democracy. Although the notion of state religious neutrality can legitimately be derived from the rights and ideals enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights (Ringelheim 2017) whereby states are under the obligation to ensure that the principle of state neutrality vis-à-vis religion and belief is respected, in reality, as shown by different scholars in Europe, there are many different interpretations of what neutrality means since the relationship between state and religion is constructed and understood differently in different European democracies (Smet 2022;Robbers 2004;Sealy and Modood 2022).…”
Section: The Contested Nature Of "Neutrality"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst Gülalp defends what he calls “classical secularism”, what I call radical or statist secularism, I defend moderate secularism, one of the most common forms of secularism across Europe today, though more in some countries than others (Sealy and Modood, 2022 ). While religious organizations should respect that the state has its own raison d'etre and should not be subordinated to religion, in moderate secularism the state does not confine religion to a restricted private space if religion can contribute to the public good, just as the state supports economic organizations, public broadcasting, cultural and sporting institutions, science, universities and so on, while respecting (at least in liberal democracies) their relative autonomy (Modood, 2019 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%