2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world

Abstract: Programmes and policies for a Circular Economy (CE) are fast becoming key to regional and international plans for creating sustainable futures. Framed as a technologically driven and economically profitable vision of continued growth in a resource-scarce world, the CE has of late been taken up by the European Commission and global business leaders alike. However, within CE debates and documentation, little is said about the social and political implications of such transformative agendas. That is, whilst CE pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
259
0
13

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
259
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Pomponi & Moncaster (2016) in a meso-level framework developed through a meta-analysis, do include societal and behavioural aspects. Hobson & Lynch (2016) stress that considering resource efficiency measures in isolation is detrimental because the complexities of consumer behaviour are poorly understood with respect to new circular business models. Similarly, Pomponi & Moncaster (2016) stress that macro-level CE must take a future-oriented and multidisciplinary approach.…”
Section: Limitations Of a Ce Approach For Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Pomponi & Moncaster (2016) in a meso-level framework developed through a meta-analysis, do include societal and behavioural aspects. Hobson & Lynch (2016) stress that considering resource efficiency measures in isolation is detrimental because the complexities of consumer behaviour are poorly understood with respect to new circular business models. Similarly, Pomponi & Moncaster (2016) stress that macro-level CE must take a future-oriented and multidisciplinary approach.…”
Section: Limitations Of a Ce Approach For Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[73]. Second, by following incumbent pathways, the VVEA reproduces and strengthens the incumbent socio-material institutions creating social, e.g., governance-related, and material, e.g., infrastructural or technological, lock-ins and rendering alternative approaches of P recycling less probable in the future [20,74].…”
Section: Scenario 2: the Regime Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ideology sits in stark contrast to the largely policy-driven and business-led approach that characterises the CE. Critics of the CE argue that it is limited by this bias towards technological solutions and overlooked and complex social and cultural issues, such as consumer behaviour (Hobson and Lynch 2016). Therefore, hints of a more radical CE are perceived at the nexus of the CE and makerspace movements, blending the resource benefits the CE brings to society with the social value embraced by the makerspace movement.…”
Section: Synergies For Circular Makerspaces: Ideologies Visions Attmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, negative effects such as continued over-consumption as well as high environmental rebound effects, can be linked to both the CE (Murray, Skene, and Haynes 2015;Edbring, Lehner, and Mont 2016;Hobson and Lynch 2016;Hobson 2016) and makerspace (Ritzer and Jurgenson 2015) movements respectively. sustainable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%