1980
DOI: 10.2307/1927119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversification, Strategic Groups and the Structure-Conduct- Performance Relationship: A Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are content areas in the IO economics literature concerned with competition across multiple markets (Gimeno, 1994), to include strategic groups (e.g., Greening, 1979;Newman, 1973Newman, , 1978, mutual forbearance (e.g., Edwards, 1955;Bernheim & Whinston, 1990), and product-line rivalry (e.g., Brander & Eaton, 1984;Bulow, Geanakoplos, & Klemperer, 1985). While these three content areas focus on different mechanisms, the central prediction is that tacit collusion produces rivalry reduction and is more likely among firms sharing similar product-market scope because each of them realizes that intense rivalry will harm their individual performance.…”
Section: Early Intermediate Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are content areas in the IO economics literature concerned with competition across multiple markets (Gimeno, 1994), to include strategic groups (e.g., Greening, 1979;Newman, 1973Newman, , 1978, mutual forbearance (e.g., Edwards, 1955;Bernheim & Whinston, 1990), and product-line rivalry (e.g., Brander & Eaton, 1984;Bulow, Geanakoplos, & Klemperer, 1985). While these three content areas focus on different mechanisms, the central prediction is that tacit collusion produces rivalry reduction and is more likely among firms sharing similar product-market scope because each of them realizes that intense rivalry will harm their individual performance.…”
Section: Early Intermediate Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of multi-point competition traces its primary theoretical origin to IO economics (mainly oligopoly theory). There are content areas in the IO economics literature concerned with competition across multiple markets (Gimeno, 1994), to include strategic groups (e.g., Greening, 1979;Newman, 1973Newman, , 1978, mutual forbearance (e.g., Edwards, 1955;Bernheim & Whinston, 1990), and product-line rivalry (e.g., Brander & Eaton, 1984;Bulow, Geanakoplos, & Klemperer, 1985). While these three content areas focus on different mechanisms, the central prediction is that tacit collusion produces rivalry reduction and is more likely among firms sharing similar product-market scope because each of them realizes that intense rivalry will harm their individual performance.…”
Section: Early Intermediate Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to Porter's work, Hunt (1972) and Newman (1978) introduced the “strategic groups” concept, where industries were influenced by the presence of relatively homogeneous groups of firms. Caves and Porter (1977) introduced the concept of “mobility barriers,” referring to intraindustry dynamics of firms and groups, and Newman (1978) and Greening (1980) performed some works on the “competitive dynamics” topic.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%