2015
DOI: 10.1111/eufm.12061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversification, Size and Risk: the Case of Bank Acquisitions of Nonbank Financial Firms

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Vallascas and Hagendorff (2011) show that low-risk European banks diversifying into nonbanking activities experience a marked increase in default risk. Casu et al (2016) find that bank combinations with securities firms yield higher risks than combinations with insurance companies, yet provide evidence that size may be responsible, as opposed to diversification per se. Similarly, Weiß et al (2014) find an increase in systemic risk following M&A activity that is not associated with income diversification, but related to managerial hubris and the existence of deposit insurance guarantees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Vallascas and Hagendorff (2011) show that low-risk European banks diversifying into nonbanking activities experience a marked increase in default risk. Casu et al (2016) find that bank combinations with securities firms yield higher risks than combinations with insurance companies, yet provide evidence that size may be responsible, as opposed to diversification per se. Similarly, Weiß et al (2014) find an increase in systemic risk following M&A activity that is not associated with income diversification, but related to managerial hubris and the existence of deposit insurance guarantees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We refer the interested reader toCasu et al (2016) for a more detailed discussion of the bank diversification literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the direction of the effect is not always the same, and 83% of the significant coefficients are negative. From the theoretical and empirical point of view, the impact of M&A announcements on stock volatility depends on the interaction between the positive and negative effects of the deal (Amihud et al, 2002;Bozos et al, 2013;Casu et al, 2016). On the one hand, the synergy and profits that the deal may generate create uncertainty about the future of the company, which may increase stock volatility, but, on the other hand, the new information provided by announcement of the deal may cause investors' opinions about the price of the acquirer's stock to converge, which reduces volatility (Elyasiani et al, 2016).…”
Section: Acquirersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an increase in volatility could result either because of the unclear purpose of the deal or because of the rise in the concentration of market power (Amihud et al, 2002;Bozos et al, 2013;Casu, Dontis-Charitos, Staikouras, & Williams, 2016;Elyasiani et al, 2016). Although the literature focuses on the effects of the M&A announcements on shareholder wealth for acquirers, targets, and rivals, the impact on volatility has been explored less.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ang et al, 2006;Xu & Malkiel, 2003;Campbell et al, 2001), leverage (Gerlach et al, 2015;Mishra et al, 2012), credit rating (Y.-M. Lin & Shen, 2015;Abad & Robles, 2014), rm age (C.-W. Huang et al, 2014), CEO compensation (Balafas & Florackis, 2014), nancial reporting quality (Rajgopal & Venkatachalam, 2011), cash ows (Babenko et al, 2015;D. Huang & Wang, 2009), diversication (Casu et al, 2015;Roussanov, 2010), human capital (Eiling, 2013), product market competition (Irvine & Ponti, 2008), corporate sustainability (Mishra et al, 2012; K.-W. Lee & Lee, 2009), consumer voice (Luo, 2007), innovation (Mazzucato & Tancioni, 2008), stock valuation (Pastor & Pietro, 2003), ownership (Xu & Malkiel, 2003), and investor base (Chichernea et al, 2015).…”
Section: Idiosyncratic Risk and Cash Holdingsmentioning
confidence: 99%