2018
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversification of transcription factor–DNA interactions and the evolution of gene regulatory networks

Abstract: Sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) bind short DNA sequences in the genome to regulate the expression of target genes. In the last decade, numerous technical advances have enabled the determination of the DNA-binding specificities of many of these factors. Large-scale screens of many TFs enabled the creation of databases of TF DNA-binding specificities, typically represented as position weight matrices (PWMs). Although great progress has been made in determining and predicting binding specificities s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homologous transcriptional regulators may evolve differentially in different species allowing the acquisition or loss of targets and therefore the further specialisation of the regulator [52]. This means that it is not only the number, but the function, targets and sequence similarity of TFTRs and other regulators which is likely to vary between bacterial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homologous transcriptional regulators may evolve differentially in different species allowing the acquisition or loss of targets and therefore the further specialisation of the regulator [52]. This means that it is not only the number, but the function, targets and sequence similarity of TFTRs and other regulators which is likely to vary between bacterial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conclusions have been further bolstered by experimental evidence that mutations to DNA-contacting residues or core consensus nucleotides often ablate binding (Maerkl and Quake, 2009;De Masi, et al, 2011), creating large fitness penalties that pose evolutionary barriers. Here, the ability to assess many mutations in parallel and measure even subtle differences in affinity suggests that effects of mutations in trans could be compensated for by concomitant changes in nucleotides flanking cis-regulatory elements to preserve transcriptional responses (Beltran, et al, 2004;Rogers and Bulyk, 2018). In addition, the observation that mutations may stabilize helical conformations to promote DNA binding suggests that these residues could allow formation of permissive binding intermediates (Bloom, et al, 2010;Gong, et al, 2013;Jalal, et al, 2019;McKeown, et al, 2014;Starr, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher organisms, augmented complexity requires an increase in the number of biological functions. This is mainly achieved by expanding regulatory relationships rather than the number of participating genes [ 1 , 2 ]. The combinatorial or regulatory activity of proteins on structural genes seem to account for the genetic plasticity required for development, organ functional diversity, responses to environmental changes and other emergent properties of multicellularity [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%