Diversification, Integration and Emerging Market Closed-End Funds

Abstract

Using an extensive new data set on U.S. and U.K.-traded closed-end funds, we examine the diversification benefits from emerging equity markets and the extent of their integration with global capital markets. To measure diversification benefits, we exploit the duality between Hansen-Jagannathan bounds [1991] and mean-standard deviation frontiers. We find significant diversification benefits for the U.K. country funds, but not for the U.S. funds. The difference appears to relate to differences in portfolio holdings. To investigate global market integration, we compute the reduction in expected returns an investor would be willing to accept to avoid investment barriers in six countries. We find evidence of investment restrictions for Indonesia,

Do IPO index portfolios improve the investment opportunities for mean–variance investors?

“…However, as Bekaert and Urias (1996) suggest, we can assess the economic significance of the shift in the mean-variance frontier by evaluating the change in the Sharpe ratio. The Sharpe ratio, which is also known as the 'reward to variability' ratio, measures the slope of the line from the risk-free rate to any portfolio in the mean-standard deviation plane (Sharpe (1994)).…”

Determinants of S&P 500 index option returns

“…While factor analysis purports to identify the factors and the option return-generating process, spanning tests examine whether a certain set of (basis) assets can span or, equivalently, replicate payoffs of options. Motivated by the equivalence between the Hansen and Jagannathan tests and the regressionbased tests for spanning (see Bekaert and Urias (1996);Ferson (1995)), we reformalize our tests within the framework of Huberman and Kandel. The likelihood ratio test is then used to test the Huberman and Kandel spanning restrictions (HK-restrictions).…”

“…Bekaert and Urias (1996) and Ferson (1995) show that the HJ-restrictions are equivalent to the HK-restrictions. Specifically, the HK-restrictions are given by:…”

Investor Familiarity and Home Bias: Japanese Evidence

“…They suggest investor familiarity as a possible alternative explanation of home bias of US investors not to invest much in other foreign counties than in neighboring Canada. Observed home bias may be caused by measurement or benchmark errors (Bakaert and Urias, 1996;Errunza et al, 1999;Pastaor, 2000;Li, 2001;Glassman and Riddick, 2001). Other researchers lead to trend chasing patterns as a result of optimal decisions by global portfolio investors under information asymmetries (see, for example, Brennan and Cao, 1997).…”