1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00767.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversification and Performance: Critical Review and Future Directions*

Abstract: This article uses an integrative theoretical framework to review existing empirical research on the diversification-performance relationship along the three different research streams which have studied this relationship. The article highlights the considerable diversity in the findings across studies in each stream and identifies certain key theoretical and methodological issues which might help to explain the observed diversity. Also discussed is a contingency-based perspective and several useful directions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirically, the impact of diversification on firm performance is mixed (Datta et al, 1991;Hoskisson and Hitt, 1990). Some studies claim diversifying into related product markets produces higher returns than into unrelated markets, others propose that less diversified firms perform better than highly diversified firms (Christensen and Montgomery, 1981;Rumelt, 1974Rumelt, , 1982.…”
Section: Literature Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirically, the impact of diversification on firm performance is mixed (Datta et al, 1991;Hoskisson and Hitt, 1990). Some studies claim diversifying into related product markets produces higher returns than into unrelated markets, others propose that less diversified firms perform better than highly diversified firms (Christensen and Montgomery, 1981;Rumelt, 1974Rumelt, , 1982.…”
Section: Literature Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies claim diversifying into related product markets produces higher returns than into unrelated markets, others propose that less diversified firms perform better than highly diversified firms (Christensen and Montgomery, 1981;Rumelt, 1974Rumelt, , 1982. Some claim that the economies in integrating operations and core skills obtained in related diversification outweigh the costs of internal capital markets and smaller variances in sales generated by unrelated diversification (Datta et al, 1991). While Prahalad and Bettis (1986) claim that it is not product-market diversity but the strategic logic applied by managers that determines the effect of diversification on performance, Montgomery (1985) argues that it is not management conduct, but industry structure that governs firm performance.…”
Section: Literature Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Rumelt's typology includes the major categories: dominant business, related constrained, related linked and unrelated (conglomerate) businesses and has been applied in various studies (Baysinger and Hoskisson 1989;Bettis and Hall 1982;Montgomery and Singh 1987). 6 For example, Datta et al (1991) review the literature on diversification and find inconclusive evidence. Palich et al (2000) conduct a meta-study and establish an inverted U-curve, i.e.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the other important considerations is that the impact of diversification on performance has been suggested to be influenced by the effect of certain contingency variables or moderators also (Datta et al, 1991;Kang, 2011 Further, plenty of research on diversification strategies' impact on performance was conducted in U.K. or U.S. context (Afza et al, 2008;Doaei et al, 2014). Perhaps, limited studies outside these contexts have been compounding the confusion about the relationship.…”
Section: A Comment On Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these studies negated linear discount model and linear premium model of diversification and suggested optimum point in diversification. This point could be considered as point of balance between diseconomies of scale and economies of scale (Datta, Rajagopalan, & Rasheed 1991).…”
Section: Non-linear Product/geographic Diversification Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%