2015
DOI: 10.15517/rac.v39i2.21772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversidad genética entre subpoblaciones raciales bovinas de Costa Rica

Abstract: El objetivo del estudio fue cuantificar la diversidad genética entre 16 subpoblaciones raciales bovinas de Costa Rica, con base en 1412 muestras de ADN bovino de todo el país, evaluadas mediante 18 marcadores microsatélites. El número promedio de alelos (Na) por locus dentro de raza fue de 10,3, que varían entre 8 (Holstein×Jersey) y 13 (Criolla para doble propósito). El número promedio de alelos efectivo (Ne) fue de 5,04, con cambios entre 4,18 (Jersey) y 5,64 (Bos taurus×Bos indicus). La heterocigosidad obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Creole breeds are primarily used in the Peruvian livestock systems to establish crosses with other species of B. taurus, particularly Brown Swiss and Simmental in high Andean areas (Primo, 1992;Quispe, 2016). Considering AFB, the mean value of Ho (0.42) obtained in this study is lower than that (0.77) reported by Martínez et al (2015) in Costa Rica, (0.75) Lirón et al (2006) in Argentine and Bolivian Creole Breeds, (0.68) Egito et al (2007), in Brazil, (0.67) Ginja et al (2010) in Portuguese Native Cattle, (0.70) Acosta et al (2012) in Cuban cattle breeds. However, most of these studies are also in creole cattle from Latin America where the values greatly differ from ours.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Creole breeds are primarily used in the Peruvian livestock systems to establish crosses with other species of B. taurus, particularly Brown Swiss and Simmental in high Andean areas (Primo, 1992;Quispe, 2016). Considering AFB, the mean value of Ho (0.42) obtained in this study is lower than that (0.77) reported by Martínez et al (2015) in Costa Rica, (0.75) Lirón et al (2006) in Argentine and Bolivian Creole Breeds, (0.68) Egito et al (2007), in Brazil, (0.67) Ginja et al (2010) in Portuguese Native Cattle, (0.70) Acosta et al (2012) in Cuban cattle breeds. However, most of these studies are also in creole cattle from Latin America where the values greatly differ from ours.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%