1998
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverse signaling pathways modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N-CoR and SMRT complexes

Abstract: Several lines of evidence indicate that the nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) complex imposes ligand dependence on transcriptional activation by the retinoic acid receptor and mediates the inhibitory effects of estrogen receptor antagonists, such as tamoxifen, suppressing a constitutive N-terminal, Creb-binding protein͞coactivator complex-dependent activation domain. Functional interactions between specific receptors and N-CoR or SMRT corepressor complexes are regulated, positively or negatively, by diverse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
382
4
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
21
382
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, other factors can affect protein activity for example phosphorylation in the case of AIB1 (Mora and Brown, 2000) or sequestration by other proteins such as prothymosinalpha in the case of ROA (Martini et al, 2000). Our studies do not exclude differences at the protein and/or activity levels of ROA and AIB1 being involved in de novo tamoxifen resistance, nor do they exclude altered expression of these factors having a role in acquired tamoxifen resistance (Lavinsky et al, 1998). Altogether, there is little evidence for altered coregulators expression in breast tumours that are de novo tamoxifen resistant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, other factors can affect protein activity for example phosphorylation in the case of AIB1 (Mora and Brown, 2000) or sequestration by other proteins such as prothymosinalpha in the case of ROA (Martini et al, 2000). Our studies do not exclude differences at the protein and/or activity levels of ROA and AIB1 being involved in de novo tamoxifen resistance, nor do they exclude altered expression of these factors having a role in acquired tamoxifen resistance (Lavinsky et al, 1998). Altogether, there is little evidence for altered coregulators expression in breast tumours that are de novo tamoxifen resistant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Low expression of NCOR1 is associated with shorter relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients, which shows that loss of NCOR1 enhances breast cancer development [194]. Further, decrease in NCOR1 protein expression correlates with acquired tamoxifen resistance in a mouse model of breast cancer [195]. Both scaffold attachment factor B (SAFB) 1 and SAFB2 suppress ERα target gene expression in breast cancer cells by associating with NCOR1 [196].…”
Section: Corepressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), previously associated with increased ER activity were found to be higher in MLET5 cells than in MCF-7 cells, with the higher levels of phosphorylation reflecting the elevated ER expression in MLET5 cells. Alternatively, altered ER transcriptional co-regulator levels could lead to attenuation of expression of regulated genes [18][19][20]. Although expression of the p160 co-activators of ER SRC1 and AIB1…”
Section: Mlet5 Cells Grow In An Estrogen-independent Manner But Showmentioning
confidence: 99%