2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13062-019-0257-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverse approaches to predicting drug-induced liver injury using gene-expression profiles

Abstract: Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a serious concern during drug development and the treatment of human disease. The ability to accurately predict DILI risk could yield significant improvements in drug attrition rates during drug development, in drug withdrawal rates, and in treatment outcomes. In this paper, we outline our approach to predicting DILI risk using gene-expression data from Build 02 of the Connectivity Map (CMap) as part of the 2018 Critical Assessment of Massive Data Analysis CMap D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the accuracy of the best performing classifier is around the 70% mark (minimum 63%, maximum 76%), stating the limitations of predicting DILI. The results are very similar to previous publications [ 8 10 , 12 ]. Additionally, we used the comparison of chemical structures as a feature to predict DILI-causing drugs, though this did not improve the accuracy substantially.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the accuracy of the best performing classifier is around the 70% mark (minimum 63%, maximum 76%), stating the limitations of predicting DILI. The results are very similar to previous publications [ 8 10 , 12 ]. Additionally, we used the comparison of chemical structures as a feature to predict DILI-causing drugs, though this did not improve the accuracy substantially.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although the data provided is much more extensive, including gene expression data from more cell lines, the gold standard is still very reduced and unbalanced. The results in terms of accuracy in the training set are very similar to the ones obtained by Sumsion et al [ 12 ], but worse when looking at the independent hold-out test. This is probably due to the fact that the current independent dataset is based on “Ambiguous-DILI” drugs, making the task more challenging.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this case two human cell lines: MCF7 and PC3, were tested. Chierici et al created a deep learning architecture for DILI prediction based on MCF7 and PC3 human cell lines [ 11 ]. The authors obtained results slightly better than random ones - MCC equal 0.19 in the best case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors obtained results slightly better than random ones - MCC equal 0.19 in the best case. In work [ 12 ] the same problem was solved by 7 various classifiers. Prediction results were similar to the previous one, with accuracy = 0.7 and MCC = 0.20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single marker gene approach may not be able to clearly differentiate all closely related members of Burkholderiales (Jin et al, 2020). Therefore, we used a more robust and reliable whole-genome method or the core-genome SNP approach to further confirm the identity of the pangolin Pf (Fig.…”
Section: Confirmation Of the Taxonomic Position Of The Pangolin Pfmentioning
confidence: 99%