Diverging Discourses: Animal Health Challenges and Veterinary Care in Northern Uganda

Abstract

People in northern Uganda are currently rebuilding their lives after a lengthy period of conflict. To facilitate this, the Ugandan government and donors have promoted investment in pigs as an important strategy for generating income quickly and ensuring livelihood security. In this context, animal health issues are an acknowledged challenge, creating uncertainty for animal owners who risk losing both their animals and income. This paper draws on policy documents guiding the veterinary sector, interviews with faculty staff at Makerere University and with veterinarians and paraprofessionals in northern Uganda, and ethnographic fieldwork in smallholder communities. The aims of this study were to contribute to an understanding of the structure of veterinary support and its dominant development narratives in policy and veterinary education and of the way in which dominant discourses and practices affect smallholders' ability to treat sick animals. Particular attention was paid to the role of paraprofessionals, here referring to actors with varied levels of training who provide animal health services mainly in rural areas. The results suggest that veterinary researchers, field veterinarians and government officials in agricultural policy share a common discourse in which making smallholders more business-minded and commercializing smallholder production are important elements in reducing rural poverty in Uganda. This way of framing smallholder livestock production overlooks other important challenges faced by smallholders in their livestock production, as well as alternative views of agricultural development. The public veterinary sector is massively under-resourced; thus while inadequately trained paraprofessionals and insufficient veterinary support currently present a risks to animal health, paraprofessionals fulfill an important role for smallholders unable to access the public veterinary sector. The dominant discourse framing paraprofessionals as “quacks” tends to downplay how important they are to smallholders by mainly highlighting the negative outcomes for animal healthcare resulting from their lack of formalized training. The conclusions of this study are that both animal health and smallholders' livelihoods would benefit from closer collaboration between veterinarians and paraprofessionals and from a better understanding of smallholders' needs.

Pharmaceuticalised livelihoods: antibiotics and the rise of ‘Quick Farming’ in peri-urban Uganda

“…Once capital had been secured to initiate the farming enterprise, for those new to farmingor at least to the farming of exotic animalsindividuals were then faced with navigating marketplaces of products and expertise to ensure the animals thrived as well as to sell their grown pigs, piglets, poultry or eggs. Knowledge of productsmedicines, disinfectants, feeds and breedswas primarily linked to media marketing information and interaction with informal animal healthcare actorsor 'paraprofessionals' (Arvidsson et al 2022) with varied levels of training. Access was often through walk-in outlets where farmers paid in cash or on credit.…”

Exploring the hurdles that remain for control of African swine fever in smallholder farming settings

“…With regard to smallholder farming, key systemic factors include access to low‐interest loans that allow farmers to invest in biosecurity and health of their pigs, and improved access to veterinary advice and care (Ebata, MacGregor, Loevinsohn, & Win, 2020). In LMICs, access to animal health and extension services is often limited, especially for poor smallholders (Aliro et al., 2022; Arvidsson et al., 2022; Ilukor et al., 2015). In such settings community animal health workers (a category of service providers that are not strictly defined and that can include lay people that are trained and supervised by public veterinary authorities as well as those with no supervision and very limited or no basic training) and lay people considered as local experts are important, accessible and locally trusted sources of information and veterinary healthcare for farmers (Ilukor et al., 2015).…”

“…In such settings community animal health workers (a category of service providers that are not strictly defined and that can include lay people that are trained and supervised by public veterinary authorities as well as those with no supervision and very limited or no basic training) and lay people considered as local experts are important, accessible and locally trusted sources of information and veterinary healthcare for farmers (Ilukor et al., 2015). These service providers understand local practices and are respected locally; therefore, they can act as important bridges between formal and local systems (Arvidsson et al., 2022). This role is currently limited or even undermined by the fact that they frequently are not given adequate training and support, and as a result have limited knowledge about ASF and other animal disease.…”

“…These service providers understand local practices and are respected locally; therefore, they can act as important bridges between formal and local systems (Arvidsson et al, 2022). This role is currently limited or even undermined by the fact that they frequently are not given adequate training and support, and as a result have limited knowledge about ASF and other animal disease.…”

Innovative Research Offers New Hope for Managing African Swine Fever Better in Resource-Limited Smallholder Farming Settings: A Timely Update

“…In Africa, where the majority of pigs are kept in smallholder farming settings in areas where ASF is endemic, research to develop a better understanding of pig keeping and disease management in these specific settings has been undertaken over the last decades [ 25 , 26 ]. Challenges that have been identified include economic issues, such as the costs of housing and feeding pigs and access to veterinary services, but also sociocultural issues around limiting access by fencing properties, and customs associated with the disposal of dead pigs [ 27 , 28 ]. Much of the information gathered is applicable to smallholder farming wherever it occurs.…”