1981
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(81)90182-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
125
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise comparison between muscle synergies found pre-and post-transection at different levels of the neuraxis suggested that a majority of muscle synergies underlying natural movement in frogs is expressed by the neural circuits within the brain stem and spinal cord (Roh et al 2011a). In addition, some electrophysiological and anatomical studies have suggested that neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1) are involved in expressing muscle synergies in mammals (Drew et al 2008;Futami et al 1979;Gentner and Classen 2006;Li and Martin 2002;Shinoda et al 1976Shinoda et al , 1981Shinoda et al , 1986. We reason that the two views, derived from experiments with a lower vertebrate and mammals, respectively, could be reconciled in the sense that the "old" M1 (Rathelot and Strick 2009), sending descending fibers primarily to the spinal interneurons, generates movements by flexibly activating synergies expressed downstream, whereas the "new" M1 is involved in encoding the more diverse movements peculiar to higher primates and humans (Roh et al 2011a;Yakovenko et al 2011).…”
Section: Neural Circuitries Involved In Expressing Muscle Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise comparison between muscle synergies found pre-and post-transection at different levels of the neuraxis suggested that a majority of muscle synergies underlying natural movement in frogs is expressed by the neural circuits within the brain stem and spinal cord (Roh et al 2011a). In addition, some electrophysiological and anatomical studies have suggested that neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1) are involved in expressing muscle synergies in mammals (Drew et al 2008;Futami et al 1979;Gentner and Classen 2006;Li and Martin 2002;Shinoda et al 1976Shinoda et al , 1981Shinoda et al , 1986. We reason that the two views, derived from experiments with a lower vertebrate and mammals, respectively, could be reconciled in the sense that the "old" M1 (Rathelot and Strick 2009), sending descending fibers primarily to the spinal interneurons, generates movements by flexibly activating synergies expressed downstream, whereas the "new" M1 is involved in encoding the more diverse movements peculiar to higher primates and humans (Roh et al 2011a;Yakovenko et al 2011).…”
Section: Neural Circuitries Involved In Expressing Muscle Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include the divergence of corticospinal axons to reach more than one motoneuron pool (e.g., Cheney 1978, 1980;Shinoda et al 1981; for review, see Lemon 2008) and the major overlapping and intermingling of cortical output zones to individual upper limb muscles documented in nonhuman primates (e.g., Landgren et al 1962;Rathelot and Strick 2006;Schieber and Hibbard 1993). As a result of such factors, there is short-term synchronization of motor unit discharge of functionally linked hand muscles or across muscle compartments of the multitendoned extrinsic hand muscles (Hockensmith et al 2005;Johnston et al 2005;Nordstrom et al 1992;Reilly et al 2004;Santello and Fuglevand 2004;Winges and Santello 2004).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Force Enslavement and Force Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, motor cortical neurons commonly diverge to innervate the motoneuron pools of several forearm and intrinsic hand muscles (e.g., Buys et al 1986;Fetz and Cheney 1980;Schieber and Santello 2004;Shinoda et al 1979Shinoda et al , 1981.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar proportion of inputs could be disrupted following stroke because motor cortical territory for proximal and distal muscles is strongly overlapping (Park et al, 2001) and as the axons descend through the subcortical structures, they are densely packed together (Morecraft et al, 2007). Additionally, the output from the motor cortical areas is divergent to multiple spinal motoneuron pools (Fetz and Cheney, 1980;Shinoda et al, 1981;Schieber, 2001), some of which may control more proximal muscles and some of which may control more distal muscles. Thus, in our sample with heterogeneous lesions, damage to many locations within the motor system may result in a similar disruption to proximal and distal inputs.…”
Section: The Absence Of a Proximal To Distal Gradient In Motor Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%