“…The collective and divergent PGF‐synthesis of (–)‐gelsedilam ( 143 ), (–)‐gelsenicine ( 146 ), (–)‐gelsedine ( 147 ), and (–)‐gelsemoxonine ( 148 ) was completed in 24 % (7 steps), 8.4 % (7 steps), 7.2 % (8 steps) and 11 % (9 steps) overall yields, respectively from known compounds 136 and 137 . The synthesis is highly efficient in step‐economy and overall yields in comparison to earlier reports, like Hiemstra's [ 56b ] synthesis (1999) of gelsedine (21 steps, 0.09 % overall yield), Carreira's [ 56c ] (2015) synthesis of gelsemoxonine (21 steps, 0.8 % overall yield), Ferreira's [ 56d ] synthesis (2016) of gelsenicine (13 steps and 4.2 % overall yield), Zhoa's [ 56e ] synthesis (2016) of gelsedilam (18 steps and 1.5 % overall yield) and the Fukuyama's [ 56f ] synthesis (2016) of gelsedilam (24 steps, 2 % overall yield), gelsenicine (24 steps, 2.5 % overall yield) and gelsedine (25 steps and 2.3 % overall yield).…”