2020
DOI: 10.3390/f12010016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergent Adaptation Strategies of Vascular Facultative Epiphytes to Bark and Soil Habitats: Insights from Stoichiometry

Abstract: Understanding the stoichiometric traits of plants is critical for studying their ecological adaptation strategies. Facultative epiphytes (which can also live on the ground) are an important component of epiphytic flora of montane forest ecosystems. However, a key gap persists in our understanding how facultative epiphytes can adapt different nutritional conditions of ground and canopy habitats? To study adaptive strategies of facultative epiphytes and the characteristics of the content and stoichiometric homeo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our nding concerning leaf N was surprising as in nutrient-poor habitats, species are generally known to have low leaf nutrient concentrations (Lambers and Poorter 1992;Wright et al 2004). In bromeliads, the high amount of nitrogen in the leaves of plants growing on the nutrient-poor substrate could be the result of luxury consumption, which is common in epiphytes (Zhang et al 2021;Zotz 2016b). However, when considering the whole plant (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our nding concerning leaf N was surprising as in nutrient-poor habitats, species are generally known to have low leaf nutrient concentrations (Lambers and Poorter 1992;Wright et al 2004). In bromeliads, the high amount of nitrogen in the leaves of plants growing on the nutrient-poor substrate could be the result of luxury consumption, which is common in epiphytes (Zhang et al 2021;Zotz 2016b). However, when considering the whole plant (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%