2002
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[0527:domdin]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence of Mitochondrial Dna Is Not Corroborated by Nuclear Dna, Morphology, or Behavior in Drosophila Simulans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This horizontal spread of an infectious organism throughout a group is another source of discrepancy between mtDNA-based and nuclear gene-based phylogenies. In Drosophila simulans, for example, the genealogy of mtDNA reflects the spread of Wolbachia rather than the relatedness of populations as assessed by nuclear DNA (Ballard et al 2002). Similarly, cytoplasmic male sterility in plants can be caused by genes in mitochondria, and can spread rapidly via selection, dragging both mitochondrial and chloroplast genes along with it (Olson and McCauley 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This horizontal spread of an infectious organism throughout a group is another source of discrepancy between mtDNA-based and nuclear gene-based phylogenies. In Drosophila simulans, for example, the genealogy of mtDNA reflects the spread of Wolbachia rather than the relatedness of populations as assessed by nuclear DNA (Ballard et al 2002). Similarly, cytoplasmic male sterility in plants can be caused by genes in mitochondria, and can spread rapidly via selection, dragging both mitochondrial and chloroplast genes along with it (Olson and McCauley 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, D. mauritiana and D. simulans share polymorphisms at many loci, and are not genealogical species under even the 50% criterion. Nevertheless, they have been genetically isolated for roughly 250,000 years, have diverged in several morphological traits, and show multiple forms of reproductive isolation (Coyne 1983(Coyne , 1984Price 1997;Kliman et al 2000;Ballard et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbes possess relatively few phenotypic characters, making nucleic acid characters attractive, and microbial genomes are typically haploid with few gene families, making it easier to find useful nuclear genes. However, in animals, too, the use of multiple nuclear markers as well as mitochondrial markers now is routine as demonstrated by recent studies of Drosophila (Ballard et al 2002;Kopp and Barmina 2005) and Hemiptera (Abe et al 2005), which show that nuclear and mitochondrial genes may support conflicting results. Nor is the use of PSR-GSC restricted to small animals, for example, a recent study of right whales found cryptic species, and in this case nuclear and mitochondrial genes were in agreement (Gaines et al 2005).…”
Section: Cryptic Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we used patterns in the geographical and genealogical structuring of mtDNA variation to make inferences about population history. These inferences are contingent upon the selective neutrality of mtDNA variation, an hypothesis that must be tested, particularly if patterns of mtDNA variation are apparently extreme (see Ballard et al . 2002).…”
Section: Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%