2008
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/135/1/012088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence of finite element formulations for inverse problems treated as optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one, the most important, is the discretization of the unknown. In fact, discretizing the unknown σ 0 produces a discretization error that adds to the noise error on the measurements and it is very difficult to tackle, see for example [48]. The main issue is in finding a good balance between the desire of a good resolution (which requires a finer discretization) and that of stability (which requires a coarser discretization).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one, the most important, is the discretization of the unknown. In fact, discretizing the unknown σ 0 produces a discretization error that adds to the noise error on the measurements and it is very difficult to tackle, see for example [48]. The main issue is in finding a good balance between the desire of a good resolution (which requires a finer discretization) and that of stability (which requires a coarser discretization).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the discrete regularised solution, that is, the solution to the regularised problem (1.3) with σ varying in such a discrete subset, should be a good approximation of the solution of the inverse problem. Actually, for inverse problems, this may not be necessarily so, as an example in [36] shows. Therefore, studying the effect of the discretisation when solving an inverse problem is not at all an easy task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%