2022
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence in host–parasite interactions during the cane toad's invasion of Australia

Abstract: Pathogens are a major source of mortality and morbidity for many species, imposing intense natural selection on the ability of hosts to detect and destroy infective organisms, but equally imposing selection on pathogens to evade defenses of the host (Papkou et al., 2016).Evolutionary theory thus predicts that parasites and their hosts are intricately co-adapted due to evolutionary "arms races" through time, whereby parasites progressively develop adaptations to overcome host defenses, and hosts develop counter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(124 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although selection and spatial sorting of dispersal-enhancing traits have altered immune investment of toads at the range edge [14,39,40], toads from the invasion front retained effective immune defences against lungworms from long-colonized areas (figure 2). The high infection success of invasion-front lungworms (consistent with earlier studies: [18,19,25]) cannot be explained by larger larvae, because the sizes of L3 used for experimental infections did not differ significantly among states. Instead, the higher infection abundances of invasion-front lungworms may result from circumstances that intensify selection on the ability of parasites to infect new hosts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although selection and spatial sorting of dispersal-enhancing traits have altered immune investment of toads at the range edge [14,39,40], toads from the invasion front retained effective immune defences against lungworms from long-colonized areas (figure 2). The high infection success of invasion-front lungworms (consistent with earlier studies: [18,19,25]) cannot be explained by larger larvae, because the sizes of L3 used for experimental infections did not differ significantly among states. Instead, the higher infection abundances of invasion-front lungworms may result from circumstances that intensify selection on the ability of parasites to infect new hosts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Most of the cane toad's native-range parasites were left behind during the species' stepwise translocation to Australia [15,16], but a nematode lungworm Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala was carried by the colonizing toads, and now occurs at high prevalence and intensity in most of the toad's invaded range [16]. However, the lungworm is absent from the toad invasion front, where low host densities reduce transmission opportunities [17,18] and thus are expected to increase selection on parasite infectivity [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, we may expect that virulent parasites select for increased resistance and that this removes a parasite-imposed range speed limit. Such a case of resistance evolution has been found for populations of the cane toad infested by lung-worms at the range margin [42,43]. Theory further suggests that natural enemies select for changes in host dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Intuitively, we may expect that virulent parasites select for increased resistance and that this removes a parasite-imposed range speed limit. Such a case of resistance evolution has been found for populations of the cane toad infested by lung-worms at the range margin [41,42]. Theory further suggests that natural enemies select for changes in host dispersal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%