1973
DOI: 10.1190/1.1440353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence Effects in a Layered Earth

Abstract: Of the various factors which influence reflection amplitudes in a seismic recording, divergence effects are possibly of least direct interest to the interpreter. Nevertheless, proper compensation for these effects is mandatory if reflection amplitudes are to be of diagnostic value. For an earth model consisting of horizontal, isotropic layers, and assuming a point source, we apply ray theory to determine an expression for amplitude correction factors in terms of initial incidence, source‐receiver offset, and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the signal decays both as a function of recording depth down the borehole and with time along any trace [8], as in the Figure (7). A further complication concerning the signal amplitude is the variability in coupling between tool and formation.…”
Section: True Amplitude Recovery (Tar)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the signal decays both as a function of recording depth down the borehole and with time along any trace [8], as in the Figure (7). A further complication concerning the signal amplitude is the variability in coupling between tool and formation.…”
Section: True Amplitude Recovery (Tar)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different VSP runs were merged after quality control of the downhole and hydrophone recordings. Newman's (1973) geometric spreading compensation was then applied to the wavefield before the up and downgoing wavefields were separated by a median filter using 5-9 traces. A low-or bandpass filter usually follows the subtraction process of the median filter to remove high-frequency artifacts that are caused by imperfect source repeatability.…”
Section: Vertical Seismic Profile Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitude decay of both earthquake and reflection seismograms has been extensively studied over the last two decades (e.g., O'DOHERTY and ANSTEY, 1971;NEWMAN, 1973;AKI and CHOUET, 1975;and AKI, 1980a,b, among many others). Without undertaking a comprehensive review, we should note a few important points: First, the amplitude decay of a seismogram is controlled by the geometric spreading of the source wavefield and relative strengths of intrinsic attenuation and seismic wave scattering (AKI, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%