2013 Workshop on Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/sdf.2013.6698263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence detectors for the δ-generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Popular data association approaches are different variants of local or global nearest neighbor (NN/GNN) [65] association using fixed one-to-one associations, joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) [41] using association probabilities with a weighted average of all validated measurements, or multiple hypothesis tracking (MHT) [17,96] using different hypotheses of the data association and track update. Recently, multi-object tracking approaches based on random finite sets (RFS) are increasingly used, e.g., [15,74,[98][99][100]133], modeling not only the object states as random numbers, but also the number of objects and measurements itself. In contrast to common object-individual tracking approaches with separate filters, this enables a more generic estimation of uncertainties about object instances and the corresponding data association.…”
Section: Challenges Of Multi-sensor Environment Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular data association approaches are different variants of local or global nearest neighbor (NN/GNN) [65] association using fixed one-to-one associations, joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) [41] using association probabilities with a weighted average of all validated measurements, or multiple hypothesis tracking (MHT) [17,96] using different hypotheses of the data association and track update. Recently, multi-object tracking approaches based on random finite sets (RFS) are increasingly used, e.g., [15,74,[98][99][100]133], modeling not only the object states as random numbers, but also the number of objects and measurements itself. In contrast to common object-individual tracking approaches with separate filters, this enables a more generic estimation of uncertainties about object instances and the corresponding data association.…”
Section: Challenges Of Multi-sensor Environment Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their publication about PHD-SLAM, Mullane et al already showed that this likelihood can be evaluated for arbitrary choices of map RFS [9], [10], although the actual choice of it has significant performance effects [15] due to the respective approximations. Nevertheless, in contrast to some other approaches, the LMB-SLAM filter offers a direct way to calculate the particle weights, since the update equation of the -GLMB filter already provides an analytic solution for the normalizing constant of the multi-object Bayes filter [16], [7]. The normalizing constant for the updates which follow equation (12) is given by the denominator of the hypotheses weights (13): (16) Thus the weight of particle at time step is given by .…”
Section: Updating the Vehicle's Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, in order to obtain better performance, Vo et al proposed a class of multi-target tracking filters based on the labeled RFS theory and the multi-Bernoulli filter that can generate trajectories while estimating targets' states and are closed under the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation. Those filters are represented by the delta generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli (δ-GLMB) [24][25][26][27] filter and the labeled multi-Bernoulli (LMB) [28,29] filter. As an efficient approximation of the δ-GLMB, the LMB filter's tracking accuracy is very close to that of the δ-GLMB filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, the iteration at time k is omitted for convenience. We follow the notations representation of LMB filters in the literature [28].…”
Section: Introduction Of Labeled Multi-bernoulli Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation