The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIVA: Exploration and Validation of Hypothesized Drug‐Drug Interactions

Abstract: Adverse reactions caused by drug‐drug interactions are a major public health concern. Currently, adverse reaction signals are detected through a tedious manual process in which drug safety analysts review a large number of reports collected through post‐marketing drug surveillance. While computational techniques in support of this signal analysis are necessary, alone they are not sufficient. In particular, when machine learning techniques are applied to extract candidate signals from reports, the resulting set… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches that use networks leverage interactive visualizations that support exploratory workflows. Kakar et al [KQR * 19] claim that networks tend to show association relationships better. They created a visual analytics system, DIVA, to analyze candidate drug interaction signals via coordinated views of force‐directed graphs and tree views.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that use networks leverage interactive visualizations that support exploratory workflows. Kakar et al [KQR * 19] claim that networks tend to show association relationships better. They created a visual analytics system, DIVA, to analyze candidate drug interaction signals via coordinated views of force‐directed graphs and tree views.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hovering one part of a visualization can highlight other parts in the same visualization, for example connected ribbons and sets in parallel sets (e.g., Abdullah et al, 2020), neighbors in a network (Brunker et al, 2019;L'Yi et al, 2017), or other features from the hovered data point (Cao et al, 2011;Gotz et al, 2011, Figure 4a). Hovering can also highlight related entities across multiple visualizations (e.g., Kakar et al, 2019;Kumar et al, 2015).…”
Section: Interaction In Visual Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Select interactions mark data items, either manually through brushing (e.g., S. Guo et al, 2018), lasso selection (e.g., Kwon et al, 2019;Raidou, Kuijf, et al, 2016;Figure 3e), clicking on a legend (R. Guo et al, 2020), or pinning (Dingen et al, 2019;Kakar et al, 2019); or automatically based on a chosen metric (e.g., Stolper et al, 2014). Selected data are typically colored prominently to easily focus on them.…”
Section: Interaction In Visual Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%