1987
DOI: 10.1002/qj.49711347804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diurnal Variations In Flow Over A Succession of Ridges and Valleys

Abstract: Observations of flow in a nearly two-dimensional valley located within a succession of similar ridges and valleys are presented. Measurements of the mean flow have been made at all times of the day and are found to be well characterized by a suitably defined Froude number. The unstable and neutral daytime flow shows a flow separation whilst when the Froude number has a value of about two (usually around evening and dawn transitions) the flow is attached and the valley well ventilated. For smaller values of Fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several parameters are used to describe the relative importance of thermal and overlying flow (inertial) effects. Mason (1987) introduced F M = (2U 2 θ/ΔBh*) 1/2 to describe the effacing of valley stable stratification by overlying flow. Here ΔB is the buoyancy contrast between the valley and the overlying flow, h* is a vertical scale of buoyancy perturbations, and θ is the slope angle.…”
Section: May 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several parameters are used to describe the relative importance of thermal and overlying flow (inertial) effects. Mason (1987) introduced F M = (2U 2 θ/ΔBh*) 1/2 to describe the effacing of valley stable stratification by overlying flow. Here ΔB is the buoyancy contrast between the valley and the overlying flow, h* is a vertical scale of buoyancy perturbations, and θ is the slope angle.…”
Section: May 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remaining differences in parametrized surface stress between the IFS IFS-SSO and MetUM experiments are likely to be largely due to differences in orographic drag scheme parameter settings, differences in the implementation of the LM97 scheme, and indirectly via differences in GSO. For instance, as discussed in Elvidge (2019), in the MetUM there is a considerably larger LM97 scheme blocking coefficient, a different method for deriving the local Froude number used by the LM97 scheme (see appendix), and a different parameterization for turbulent orographic drag in the boundary layer (which employs a drag coefficient smaller by half than that recommended from a physical perspective by Mason, 1987). This results in elevated τ SSO and lower τ BL relative to the IFS, which uses the TOFD scheme for boundary layer drag, following Beljaars et al (2004).…”
Section: Impacts On Total Parameterized Surface Stress and Its Partitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated by Baines (1995), the occurrence of bluff-body flow separation in the lee of an obstacle depends on the speed of the approaching flow and on the stability. Mason (1987) observed flow separation or decoupling in a small, approximately 200-m deep valley under neutral and unstable conditions, while the flow remained attached under stable conditions with a Froude number < 2, and was able to reproduce that result with numerical simulations. Similar results based on tethersonde measurements were found by Holden et al (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%