Diurnal variation in stature: is stretching the answer?

Abstract

Aims-To investigate the extent and timing of diurnal variation in stature and to examine the eVectiveness of the stretched technique in reducing the loss in height. Setting-A Southampton school. Design-Fifty three children, divided into two groups, were measured by two independent auxologists using a Leicester height measure. Each child was measured four times, at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500, using both an unstretched and a stretched technique. Outcome measures-Height loss after each of the three time intervals for both unstretched and stretched modes. Results-There was a clear decrease in stature during the morning, but no further loss occurred after the subjects had been up for around six hours. The mean height losses for the unstretched (stretched) modes were 0.31 cm (0.34 cm) and 0.20 cm (0.23 cm) for the periods 0900 to 1100 and 1100 to 1300, respectively, but only 0.045 cm (-0.019 cm) from 1300 to 1500. Stretching did not reduce the eVects of diurnal variation, but significantly aVected the recorded height by an average of 0.28 cm. There was no significant diVerence in reproducibility using either technique (SD 0.30 cm stretched v 0.31 cm unstretched). Conclusions-Diurnal variation in stature may substantially aVect the reliability of height data and careful consideration should be given to the timing of repeat measurements. As most height loss occurs in the morning, afternoon clinic appointments would be preferable. The standard stretched technique does not appear to reduce diurnal variation, nor does it affect precision. Measurements made using an unstretched method are recommended to avoid interobserver diVerences, known to occur where diVerent observers are used.

Clinical efficacy of group-based treatment for childhood obesity compared with routinely given individual counseling

“…Therefore, the weights for height are not fully comparable with those at baseline and immediately after the intervention when the children were measured in the morning. Obviously, some height loss occurs during day, 36,37 and the weight in the morning after fasting is less than later during the day. And fourthly, although we followed the children 6 months after the intervention, the evaluation of the permanence of the results demands much longer follow-up times.…”

Challenges of Accurately Measuring and Using BMI and Other Indicators of Obesity in Children

“…10 For children, one can expect a mean height difference of ϳ1.5 cm (SD: 0.46 cm) between rising and late afternoon, 11 with most of the change probably occurring during the first 2 to 3 hours of the day. 12 In practice, it is helpful to understand the expected diurnal variation in child height but probably impractical to try to time height measurements to accommodate it, unless one is engaged in a rigorous research protocol that requires serial measurements on a small number of individual children. For the data included in the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts, 13 heights were measured from mornings through evenings so that the reference percentiles represent something like heights averaged throughout the day, and the associated within-child variation is included in the total variance in height captured in the published percentiles or z scores at an age.…”

Evaluating the effects of asthma therapy on childhood growth: principles of study design

“…The optimal method for measuring statural height to assess long-term growth is stadiometry, assuming the subject is at least 2 yrs of age. Each participant should be assigned to a particular nurse for height measurement at every visit, to minimize any scope for interindividual variation [45,46]. In one study, the coefficient of variation when the height of 22 individuals was measured by one observer (individuals measured five times) was 0.09, compared with 0.16 when individuals were measured by five different observers [44].…”