2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09508-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dithiothreitol-based oxidative potential for airborne particulate matter: an estimation of the associated uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, cell-free assays fail to explain and predict physiological responses. OP cell-free assays are diverse [63] and include dithiothreitol (DTT) assay [64][65][66], ascorbic acid (AA) assay [67,68], glutathione (GSH) [69] and dichlorofluorescin (DCFH) assays [70,71] and electron spin (or paramagnetic) resonance (ESR) [72,73]. ESR measures the generation of ROS via electron spin resonance, while the DTT, GSH and AA assays measure the depletion rate of chemical proxies for cellular reductants (DTT) or antioxidants (AA), which is proportional to the generation rate of ROS.…”
Section: Oxidative Potential Measurement Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cell-free assays fail to explain and predict physiological responses. OP cell-free assays are diverse [63] and include dithiothreitol (DTT) assay [64][65][66], ascorbic acid (AA) assay [67,68], glutathione (GSH) [69] and dichlorofluorescin (DCFH) assays [70,71] and electron spin (or paramagnetic) resonance (ESR) [72,73]. ESR measures the generation of ROS via electron spin resonance, while the DTT, GSH and AA assays measure the depletion rate of chemical proxies for cellular reductants (DTT) or antioxidants (AA), which is proportional to the generation rate of ROS.…”
Section: Oxidative Potential Measurement Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the PM toxicity, we measured its oxidative potential with two commonly used acellular assays, which have the advantage of faster reading speed, lower price, less controlled environments and suitability for automation, in comparison with the cellular assays [13,16,17,[26][27][28]. One assay uses dithiothreitol (DTT) as a proxy of cellular reductants [29][30][31][32][33] and the other uses ascorbic acid (AA) as a chemical surrogate of physiological antioxidants in the respiratory tract lining fluids (RTLFs) [6,9,34,35]. Both assays measure the depletion rate of the target antioxidants DTT or AA, which is defined as the sample oxidative potential, as it is proportional to the generation rate of ROS [11,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ascorbic acid (AA) and dithiothreitol (DTT) assays have emerged as potential standards to evaluate ROS and OP because of their relatively widespread use (Calas et al, 2017;Shirmohammadi et al, 2017;Yadav and Phuleria, 2020). However, due to the lack of standard operating procedures and calibrations, comparisons of OP measurements conducted by different laboratories is not advised, or at least should be done very cautiously (Janssen et al, 2014;Calas et al, 2018;Molina et al, 2020). OP is usually expressed in one of two ways: OP per volume of air (OP v ), or OP per PM mass (OP m ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%