2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diterpenoids from Euphorbia glomerulans with potential reversal activities against P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Euphylonanes E ( 5 ) and F ( 6 ) presented the identical molecular formula C 33 H 42 O 7 according to HRESIMS analyses ([M + Na] + m / z 573.2809 and 573.2851, calcd 573.2823). Their NMR spectra (Table ) were closely related to those of euphoglonane A ( 17 ), except for the existence of an additional 2,3-dimethylbutanoate group. Such a moiety was a substituent at C-3 in 5 and at C-5 in 6 , respectively, as gleaned from the downfield-shifted oxymethine signals in 5 and 6 (H-3: δ H 5.38 in 5 , 3.78 in 6 , and 4.41 in 17 ; H-5: δ H 3.73 in 5 , 5.25 in 6 , and 3.48 in 17 ) along with the correlations from the corresponding oxymethines to the corresponding ester carbonyls in the HMBC (Figure S2).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Euphylonanes E ( 5 ) and F ( 6 ) presented the identical molecular formula C 33 H 42 O 7 according to HRESIMS analyses ([M + Na] + m / z 573.2809 and 573.2851, calcd 573.2823). Their NMR spectra (Table ) were closely related to those of euphoglonane A ( 17 ), except for the existence of an additional 2,3-dimethylbutanoate group. Such a moiety was a substituent at C-3 in 5 and at C-5 in 6 , respectively, as gleaned from the downfield-shifted oxymethine signals in 5 and 6 (H-3: δ H 5.38 in 5 , 3.78 in 6 , and 4.41 in 17 ; H-5: δ H 3.73 in 5 , 5.25 in 6 , and 3.48 in 17 ) along with the correlations from the corresponding oxymethines to the corresponding ester carbonyls in the HMBC (Figure S2).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The structure of 4 was ultimately secured by alkaline hydrolysis of 4 to 20-deoxyingenol (4a) (Scheme 1), whose structure was ascertained by X-ray diffraction analysis 30 and was thereby assigned to be 3-O-(2,3-dimethylbutanoyl)-20deoxyingenol. Their NMR spectra (Table 2) were closely related to those of euphoglonane A (17), 31 except for the existence of an additional 2,3-dimethylbutanoate group. Such a moiety was a substituent at C-3 in 5 and at C-5 in 6, respectively, as gleaned from the downfield-shifted oxymethine signals in 5 and 6 (H-3: δ H 5.38 in 5, 3.78 in 6, and 4.41 in 17; H-5: δ H 3.73 in 5, 5.25 in 6, and 3.48 in 17) along with the correlations from the corresponding oxymethines to the corresponding ester carbonyls in the HMBC (Figure S2).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations