2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/761/1/68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbed Zone and Piston Shock Ahead of Coronal Mass Ejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wood & Howard 2009;Ontiveros & Vourlidas 2009). Second, we notice that values derived in Paper 1 for the projected thicknesses (0.06 R ⊙ at 11:26 UT and 0.09 R ⊙ at 11:50 UT) of the shock shell at different altitudes/times are in good agreement with values given by Eselevich & Eselevich (2012, Figure 5, bottom panel) and identified as representative of the proton mean free paths in the corona below heliocentric distances of 6 R ⊙ . Third, these values for the thicknesses of the shock shell were used (after correction for the shock motion during the LASCO C2 exposure time) to estimate reliable values of the actual shock depth L along the LOS (0.28 R ⊙ at 11:26 UT and 0.61 R ⊙ at 11:50 UT), which is a critical parameter for the derivation of the compression ratios; this estimate was different to previous and successive works (e.g.…”
Section: Previous Results Of Shocks With Uv and Wl Datasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Wood & Howard 2009;Ontiveros & Vourlidas 2009). Second, we notice that values derived in Paper 1 for the projected thicknesses (0.06 R ⊙ at 11:26 UT and 0.09 R ⊙ at 11:50 UT) of the shock shell at different altitudes/times are in good agreement with values given by Eselevich & Eselevich (2012, Figure 5, bottom panel) and identified as representative of the proton mean free paths in the corona below heliocentric distances of 6 R ⊙ . Third, these values for the thicknesses of the shock shell were used (after correction for the shock motion during the LASCO C2 exposure time) to estimate reliable values of the actual shock depth L along the LOS (0.28 R ⊙ at 11:26 UT and 0.61 R ⊙ at 11:50 UT), which is a critical parameter for the derivation of the compression ratios; this estimate was different to previous and successive works (e.g.…”
Section: Previous Results Of Shocks With Uv and Wl Datasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The distance between the IL and the OL becomes larger with propagation, implying that the OL moves faster than the IL. These characteristics have been observed in other CME-driven shocks (Ontiveros & Vourlidas 2009;Chen 2011;Gopalswamy et al 2012;Eselevich & Eselevich 2012;Kouloumvakos et al 2014;Lee et al 2014), suggesting that the OL may be the front of a CME-driven shock. The double layers appear at 03:45 UT in 193Å and 211Å, and then propagate outward.…”
Section: Observationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, combination of EUV and WL data shows that the shock thickness δ is of the same order as the proton mean free path λ p only for heliocentric distances r < 6 R while higher up in the corona δ << λ p . Hence, during its propagation, the shock regime changes from collisional to collisionless (Eselevich & Eselevich 2012). These information are crucial for our understanding of the physics at the base of the shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%