2021
DOI: 10.1108/aa-10-2020-0158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance rejection control of airborne radar stabilized platform based on active disturbance rejection control inverse estimation algorithm

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to study a disturbance rejection controller to improve the anti-interference capability and the position tracking performance of airborne radar stabilized platform that ensures the stability and clarity of synthetic aperture radar imaging. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes a disturbance rejection control scheme for an airborne radar stabilized platform based on the active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) inverse estimation algorithm. Exploiting the extended state obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to equation (3), f ( x 1 , x 2 , t ) is the function of inner disturbance, and Tf is external disturbance. The classical ESO considers f ( x 1 , x 2 , t ) and Tf as an extended state together, and equation (3) can be rewritten as follows (Mei and Yu, 2021): where x3=f(x1,x2,t)+Tf is the total disturbances, and w 1 ( t ) is the derivative of x 3 . By establishing an ESO for equation (7) through a nonlinear function, the classical ESO can be written as follows: where fal(e,α,σ)=true{lefteσ1α,true|etrue|σ|e|αsign(e),true|etrue|>σ as in Han(2009), σ is the length of the linear segment interval, e is the error between the estimated state and the actual output, and α is a constant between 0 and 1. z 1 , z 2 , z 3 are the estimated values of x 1 , x 2 , x 3, respectively, and β 01 , β 02 , β 03 are the parameter values of the ESO.…”
Section: Design Of Improved Active Disturbance Rejection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to equation (3), f ( x 1 , x 2 , t ) is the function of inner disturbance, and Tf is external disturbance. The classical ESO considers f ( x 1 , x 2 , t ) and Tf as an extended state together, and equation (3) can be rewritten as follows (Mei and Yu, 2021): where x3=f(x1,x2,t)+Tf is the total disturbances, and w 1 ( t ) is the derivative of x 3 . By establishing an ESO for equation (7) through a nonlinear function, the classical ESO can be written as follows: where fal(e,α,σ)=true{lefteσ1α,true|etrue|σ|e|αsign(e),true|etrue|>σ as in Han(2009), σ is the length of the linear segment interval, e is the error between the estimated state and the actual output, and α is a constant between 0 and 1. z 1 , z 2 , z 3 are the estimated values of x 1 , x 2 , x 3, respectively, and β 01 , β 02 , β 03 are the parameter values of the ESO.…”
Section: Design Of Improved Active Disturbance Rejection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the input is a signal with noise, the TD has a superior filtering effect in suppressing the noise. 3) can be rewritten as follows (Mei and Yu, 2021):…”
Section: Tracking Differentiatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The article also presents an adaptive neural network to approximate the uncertainty and unknown disorders of the system and improve control performance. An anti-disturbance control scheme for an airborne radar stabilization platform based on the inverse estimation algorithm of self-rejecting control (ADRC) is used to solve the stability and clarity problems of radar imaging [ 11 ]. An improved dynamic variational differential evolution algorithm (DMDE) is proposed to optimize the PID control parameters and is validated by simulation for several standard industrial-controlled object models [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%