2017
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2016.2562502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance Observer Based Composite Learning Fuzzy Control of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Dead Zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the nonsmooth dynamics, including nonlinear friction [7][8][9] and dead-zone [10][11][12], introduced by transmission devices may deteriorate the control performance. To reduce the effect of the nonlinear friction, various control algorithms have been proposed such as sliding mode technique (SMC) [13][14][15][16][17][18] and adaptive control [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the nonsmooth dynamics, including nonlinear friction [7][8][9] and dead-zone [10][11][12], introduced by transmission devices may deteriorate the control performance. To reduce the effect of the nonlinear friction, various control algorithms have been proposed such as sliding mode technique (SMC) [13][14][15][16][17][18] and adaptive control [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input saturation has an effect on control performance, which has been investigated in the last few decades. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy modeling approach was utilized to control the nonlinear systems with actuator saturation in the work of Cao and Lin. 37 The stabilization problem was addressed for a class of Hamiltonian systems with state time-delay and input saturation in the work of Sun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of MPC algorithm is based on the moving horizon approach where the control action is computed to obtain the desired performance over a finite time horizon under uncertainties and constraints. 1 The use of the constraints clearly distinguishes MPC from other control methods such as neural network-based approach, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] leading to a more reliable controller and tighter control with no requirement on training data. However, the heavy online computational burden 9 and numerical condition of the control algorithm are the main obstacles in the application of MPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%