2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00797.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance‐Mediated Mammal Persistence and Abundance‐Area Relationships in Amazonian Forest Fragments

Abstract: Few researchers have investigated the synergistic effects of tropical forest fragmentation and disturbance on species persistence and abundance. We examined effects of both forest-patch metrics and forest disturbance in determining richness and abundance of midsized to large-bodied mammal species in a highly fragmented Amazonian forest landscape. Twenty-one forest fragments, ranging from 2 to 14,480 ha, and two continuous forest sites were sampled based on sightings, tracks, line-transect censuses, armadillo b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
166
4
26

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
166
4
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, it is also common to find the opossum in residential areas. In addition, species like the opossum and small mammals can increase their abundance in small fragments, due to their generalist habits and to the absence of predators (Fonseca & Robinson 1990, Chiarello 1999, Michalski & Peres 2007.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of this, it is also common to find the opossum in residential areas. In addition, species like the opossum and small mammals can increase their abundance in small fragments, due to their generalist habits and to the absence of predators (Fonseca & Robinson 1990, Chiarello 1999, Michalski & Peres 2007.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species like Tapirus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) (tapir), Mazama americana (Erxlesben, 1777) (red brocket), Tayassu pecari (Link, 1795) (white-lipped peccary) e Pecari tajacu (Linnaeus, 1758) (collared peccary) are common to the region (personal observation), but they do not use the fragment, where they must have been extinct due to absence of conditions of utilization, like size and edge effect. The presence of mammals is usually limited by the area size (Chiarello 1999, Michalski & Peres 2007, which is a problem common in urban fragments, because in general the fragments are small. Beyond the area limitation of the fragment, the edge effect may also cause negative effects to the mammalian fauna (Murcia 1995, Stevens & Husband 1998, Fahrig 2003.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although standardized line transect surveys provide a powerful dataset for analysis of species abundances they are unlikely to approximate a truly representative sample of the mid and large bodied mammal fauna. This group includes rare, cryptic and illusive species that to achieve management objectives including knowledge of which species are present are best surveyed with a combination of techniques (Michalski & Peres 2007, Espartosa et al 2011, Munari et al 2011. The objective of the present study was to use complementary survey techniques to obtain a baseline species list and estimate the species richness of mid and large bodied mammals in Núcleo Caraguatatuba as the first step to increasing our knowledge of the regional mammalian fauna and to support the management activities within this protected area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mais espécies ocorrem nos fragmentos maiores, MRT e MRO, e apenas nessas áreas, espécies essas com porte superior a 20 kg, como cateto (Pecari tajacu), capivara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) e veado-mateiro (Mazama americana). A persistência de espécies em fragmentos é explicada, principalmente, pelo tamanho da área remanescente (CHIARELLO, 1999;MICHALSKI;PERES, 2007), mas fatores como o isolamento também podem estar influenciando nas taxas de recolonização e sobrevivência das espécies (CROOKS, 2002). Como MRT e MRO possuem conectividade maior, possivelmente têm maiores taxas de recolonização, o que acaba refletindo positivamente no número de espécies (GILBERT-NORTON et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified